Future Of Mankind - User contributions [en]

Talk:Asket's Explanations - Part 8

2010-12-31T12:41:03Z

Milind Bokil: Comment provided by Milind Bokil - via ArticleComments extension

--[[User:Sanjin|Sanjin]] 19:47, 31 October 2009 (UTC)A word about relegeon, it seems to me like the ending syllable "eon" points to the meaning of "An indefinitely long period of time", or evolution toward infinity. Is this where this word comes from?
== Kkeschoi said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
why didn't Billy leave something writen about billy's life and hide it in the ground somewhere and then in the year 32, and then re-discover it our time, that would be amazing proof that can't be debunk, and he could do that when ever the ET take him back in time, which is very easy to do for them.

--[[User:Kkeschoi|Kkeschoi]] 14:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
</div>
== Milind Bokil said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
221. God was never put on a level with Creation by me, because God is a creature of Creation as are you and I and every other human.

My question

Can we not name creation as "God" ? Isn’t “creation” conscious about itself?

--[[User:Milind Bokil|Milind Bokil]] 07:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
</div>
== Jamesm said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Hi Milind,

Well no because the term "God" is supposed to be a very old term that has a completely different meaning. Its a title for a human being. See the page [[God]]. If you call Creation "God" instead of "Creation" then you might as well call a "spoon" a "fork" too, if you get my meaning.

--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 19:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
</div>
== Milind Bokil said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Hi James no offence….

Ideally, I believe that we can’t name HIM as he is inconceivable to a normal human being. What I meant was that both the “spoon” and the “Fork” are made of same essence. You name them differently based on your different perceptions of it. But the “essence” is beyond the definition of “spoon” and “Fork”. It is just that “All IS”.

Further the link God, also sates the following “One thing led to another and soon the original meaning of the word "God" was forgotten” so you see that the word “GOD” was never meant to be a title to human being.

I believe that the highest conceivable “TRUTH” by a highly (spiritually) evolved being may be close to understanding GOD.

--[[User:Milind Bokil|Milind Bokil]] 12:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
</div>

Talk:Contact Report 001

2010-12-30T09:32:41Z

Milind Bokil: Comment provided by Milind Bokil - via ArticleComments extension

<noinclude>Comments on [[Contact Report 001]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== Christopher said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
In Contact Report 001, Semjase tells Billy

32. Many faunal or even floral life forms have also reached highly advanced levels of existence.
33. So there are species that have acquired much knowledge and have freed themselves from their environment; they travel through space and also occasionally come to Earth.
34. Many of them are rather unpleasant creatures and live in a certain barbarism that frequently is nearly as bad as the terrestrials'.
35. One must be on one's guard from them because they often attack and destroy everything that gets in their way.
36. Often they have destroyed whole planets or forced their inhabitants into barbaric slavery.
37. This is one of our tasks:
38. To warn the people on Earth of these creatures.
39. Let the people know this because the time is approaching when a conflict with these degenerate human creatures becomes unavoidable.

Has any more information about these evil extraterrestrial humans been released?
Is there information about them in Contact Reports that haven't yet been translated into English?

--Christopher 10:48, 13 July 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Mark said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
I was worried about that as well, they said that in the year 2000 ET's would arrive. I think maybe the AA and High Council thought Earth is not quite ready to handle such advanced beings yet. They would probably come laugh at our sorry excuse for a defense and annihilate us in less than 5 seconds. Since Earth is not fully united yet and many are quarreling over silly troubles still. I think the invasion was postponed or averted by the ????? Plejaren Federation or are these Barbarians still on there way, if so can we have a day and date and a plan to deflect there attacks.:) I always wondered why that ship that landed on Roswell came. I think it was a clue as how to find a way to counter beam ships. Let's find a scientific way without blowing ourselves up in the process to dent these suckers or cause any attacks on Earth lose there morale and send these folks packing.

--Mark 12:08, 13 July 2010 (BST)
</div>
== John said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Mark,

Your comments are childish and distorted, first of all the Plejarens convinced the ET's who planned to make contact with Earth in the year 2000 not to proceed because the earthly leaders are lustful for their technology in order to gain more power and the populance are not ready to accept contact with higher beings.

Besides they are not aggressive, not like the other ET's that planned to invade and take over not just Earth, but other planets because their solar system was dying, but was evacuated by the Plejarens and their allies who found suitable unihabited planets for them.

Yet, you forgot to mention, that as long as Earthlings do not have the capacity to freely fly in outer space, the Plejarens are obligated to protect Earth from attack by other ET's, but not to intervene in culture or otherwise influence events on Earth.

--John 22:14, 13 July 2010 (BST)
</div>
== newinitiation said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Samjase was also referring to the Giza intelligences, MIB from sirius, the renegades from beta centauri who aided the GI, ashtar sheran, wilo the wisp species and other ET group who've attempted assassination attempts on billy's life.

--newinitiation 17:55, 25 July 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Mark said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Hi John, it is nice to meet a MATURE non comical being on the planet who is superior to all others. Are you a Plejaren? Where do you get your info. I would like to subscribe. :)

--Mark 21:26, 25 July 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Milind Bokil said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Why do pelidians distant themselves with the word religion. I agree that most of our contemporary religions do not preach the truth. So, truly the people, with or without the help of a protagonist needs to amend these teachings and align to natural laws of creation. But what is the harm in using the word religion ?

--[[User:Milind Bokil|Milind Bokil]] 09:32, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
</div>

Talk:Asket's Explanations - Part 8

2010-12-30T07:23:58Z

Milind Bokil: Comment provided by Milind Bokil - via ArticleComments extension