<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://future.figucarolina.org//w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Noahochoa</id>
	<title>Future Of Mankind - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://future.figucarolina.org//w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Noahochoa"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://future.figucarolina.org//Billy_Meier/Special:Contributions/Noahochoa"/>
	<updated>2026-06-01T13:32:22Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://future.figucarolina.org//w/index.php?title=Talk:Blog&amp;diff=13570</id>
		<title>Talk:Blog</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://future.figucarolina.org//w/index.php?title=Talk:Blog&amp;diff=13570"/>
		<updated>2010-11-26T23:26:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Noahochoa: Comment provided by Noahochoa - via ArticleComments extension&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;Comments on [[Blog]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;comments /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----- __NOEDITSECTION__&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Noahochoa said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
what is fine matter in terms of sub atomic particles and the 4 fundamental forces?... Or is it something else all together like, anti matter or dark matter/dark energy?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Noahochoa|Noahochoa]] 08:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Hawaiian said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Fine matter is NON-CONDENSED energy like thoughts or ideas, sub-atomic particles are COARSE condensed matter. There are 49 levels of coarse material matter as one gets closer to the 49th level, the distinction between fine and coarse energy becomes very vague indeed and are often interchangeable, meaning it can be both at the same time depending on one&#039;s prospective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What do you mean by 4 fundamental forces?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Barbarian216|Hawaiian]] 18:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Newinitiation said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Hey Hawaiian&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ve read that there are only 7 levels of coarse matter instead of 49.&lt;br /&gt;
 Did the 4 fundamental force meant strong and weak nuclear force, gravitation and electromagnetism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Newinitiation|Newinitiation]] 01:32, 26 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Hawaiian said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
True, 7 material levels, but within EACH level are also 7 sub-levels for a total of 49.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Barbarian216|Hawaiian]] 22:21, 26 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Noahochoa said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
strong nuclear force, electromagnetism, weak nuclear force, gravity.... but even thoughts &amp;amp; ideas are composed of chemical &amp;amp; electrical interactions in the brain, so wouldn&#039;t they be &amp;quot;coarse matter&amp;quot; too?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Noahochoa|Noahochoa]] 23:26, 26 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Noahochoa</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://future.figucarolina.org//w/index.php?title=Talk:Blog&amp;diff=13555</id>
		<title>Talk:Blog</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://future.figucarolina.org//w/index.php?title=Talk:Blog&amp;diff=13555"/>
		<updated>2010-11-25T08:46:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Noahochoa: Comment provided by Noahochoa - via ArticleComments extension&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;Comments on [[Blog]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;comments /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----- __NOEDITSECTION__&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Noahochoa said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
what is fine matter in terms of sub atomic particles and the 4 fundamental forces?... Or is it something else all together like, anti matter or dark matter/dark energy?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Noahochoa|Noahochoa]] 08:46, 25 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Noahochoa</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://future.figucarolina.org//w/index.php?title=Talk:How_did_our_universe_and_our_world_come_into_existence%3F&amp;diff=13554</id>
		<title>Talk:How did our universe and our world come into existence?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://future.figucarolina.org//w/index.php?title=Talk:How_did_our_universe_and_our_world_come_into_existence%3F&amp;diff=13554"/>
		<updated>2010-11-25T07:49:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Noahochoa: Comment provided by Noahochoa - via ArticleComments extension&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;Comments on [[How did our universe and our world come into existence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;comments /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----- __NOEDITSECTION__&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ory said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
How many absolute absolutums are in existence .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and absolute perfection does not exist anywere , do you agree .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--ory 05:57, 29 March 2010 (BST)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Hawaiian said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just my opinion, from what I can gather, the Absolute Absolution is the highest &amp;quot;state of BEING&amp;quot; reached after Creation has evolved or &amp;quot;obtained&amp;quot; the 10 to the 49th power of evolution, in which more Creation(s) are created and &amp;quot;adds&amp;quot; to the endless/timeless of a never ending &amp;quot;expansion&amp;quot; of the Absolute Absolution which &amp;quot;exists&amp;quot; in the non-space realm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolute Perfection can never be &amp;quot;obtained&amp;quot;, it is always evolving, and if it did reach that &amp;quot;stage&amp;quot;, then evolution will cease to evolve...it is a never ending process that continues forever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It&amp;quot; or better described as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--Hawaiian 07:28, 29 March 2010 (BST)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Suv said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Even Creation is evolving. So absolute pefection does not exists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even the Absolute Absolutum evolves into Ur-Absolutum, Central Absolutum, Creations Absolutum, Super Absolutum, Sohar Absolutum, BEING Absolutum and possibly many more higher Absolutum forms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Suv|Suv]] 17:13, 29 March 2010 (BST)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Stuart said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I do not have a religious axe to grind, but I find the comment about being no Creator God.&lt;br /&gt;
If these happening are the result of &#039;Spiritual-Physical&#039; processes, how can a &#039;Creator&#039; not be involved.  Also, this &#039;birthing&#039; process was set up to behave in a particular manner. Where did it&#039;s programming come from?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regards&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--Stuart 09:45, 27 August 2010 (BST)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Noahochoa said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
can you explain the 7 universal belts to me?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Noahochoa|Noahochoa]] 07:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Noahochoa said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
can you explain the 7 universal belts to me?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Noahochoa|Noahochoa]] 07:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Noahochoa</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://future.figucarolina.org//w/index.php?title=Talk:How_did_our_universe_and_our_world_come_into_existence%3F&amp;diff=13553</id>
		<title>Talk:How did our universe and our world come into existence?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://future.figucarolina.org//w/index.php?title=Talk:How_did_our_universe_and_our_world_come_into_existence%3F&amp;diff=13553"/>
		<updated>2010-11-25T07:47:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Noahochoa: Comment provided by Noahochoa - via ArticleComments extension&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;Comments on [[How did our universe and our world come into existence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;comments /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----- __NOEDITSECTION__&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ory said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
How many absolute absolutums are in existence .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and absolute perfection does not exist anywere , do you agree .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--ory 05:57, 29 March 2010 (BST)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Hawaiian said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just my opinion, from what I can gather, the Absolute Absolution is the highest &amp;quot;state of BEING&amp;quot; reached after Creation has evolved or &amp;quot;obtained&amp;quot; the 10 to the 49th power of evolution, in which more Creation(s) are created and &amp;quot;adds&amp;quot; to the endless/timeless of a never ending &amp;quot;expansion&amp;quot; of the Absolute Absolution which &amp;quot;exists&amp;quot; in the non-space realm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Absolute Perfection can never be &amp;quot;obtained&amp;quot;, it is always evolving, and if it did reach that &amp;quot;stage&amp;quot;, then evolution will cease to evolve...it is a never ending process that continues forever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It&amp;quot; or better described as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--Hawaiian 07:28, 29 March 2010 (BST)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Suv said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Even Creation is evolving. So absolute pefection does not exists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even the Absolute Absolutum evolves into Ur-Absolutum, Central Absolutum, Creations Absolutum, Super Absolutum, Sohar Absolutum, BEING Absolutum and possibly many more higher Absolutum forms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Suv|Suv]] 17:13, 29 March 2010 (BST)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Stuart said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I do not have a religious axe to grind, but I find the comment about being no Creator God.&lt;br /&gt;
If these happening are the result of &#039;Spiritual-Physical&#039; processes, how can a &#039;Creator&#039; not be involved.  Also, this &#039;birthing&#039; process was set up to behave in a particular manner. Where did it&#039;s programming come from?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regards&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--Stuart 09:45, 27 August 2010 (BST)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Noahochoa said ... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&#039;commentBlock&#039;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
can you explain the 7 universal belts to me?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Noahochoa|Noahochoa]] 07:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Noahochoa</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>