Future Of Mankind - User contributions [en]

Talk:Faith (Belief) and God

2011-03-11T00:53:54Z

Usedname: Comment provided by Usedname - via ArticleComments extension

<noinclude>Comments on [[Faith (Belief) and God]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== Jamesm said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Sanjin - Why did you decide to change ''respectively'' to ''viz.'', please? Thanks.

--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 12:25, 18 April 2010 (BST)
</div>
== sanjin said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Well, respectively is not the right way to translate "resp.", because in the English language respectively means "each separately in the order mentioned", while the German resp. most often restates the previous point in a different or more precise view.

There are several other phrases which I could have used like: "or rather", "(or) more precisely", "namely", "that is", "i.e.", etc.

Viz., which is a contraction from videlicet is something I learned about recently and can be read about here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viz.

I think that it is very close if not the same as the German "resp.".

One other thing which it not 100% correct in this translation is "animals and other creatures". The German term Getier was translated as creatures since there is no better term but there is a slight difference. Creatures may also refer to human beings, while Getier does not. It was translated the same in the GoT, but it leaves small gaps in the logic, which are in the relentless original not present.

But there are some other small things in this translation which I already asked Mariann for correctness.

--sanjin 18:27, 18 April 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Jamesm said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Thanks Sanjin I agree with you on this issue. Viz does look more appropriate.

--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 22:26, 18 April 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Sanjin said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Hey, I asked Mariann Mondria Uehlinger about one of the sentences, because I thought that I didn't understand it properly. At first she replied that there seems to be something wrong with the sentence and that she will ask Billy.

Then she sent me an e-mail which basically states that Billy said that the sentence in the original text is missing a word. Looks like it wasn't completely relentless as I thought. Could have been that Billy made a mistake. He looked very human to me.

Here is Mariann's e-mail:

Habe heute nachmittag Billy gefragt weil mir der Satz wie bereits vorgängig geschrieben unlogisch schien. Billy bestätigte, dass ein Wort fehle, nämlich "keine". Der Satz heisst dann demzufolge richtig:
Und Gott, so glaubt der Gläubige, verhindere, dass er im Leben keine Sicherheit habe und sich nicht wie eine treibende Feder im Wind fühle.
And God, so the believer believes, would prevent that he (the believer) would have no security in life and that he wouldn’t feel like a drifting feather in the wind.

Bezüglich "drifting" bin ich mir nicht sicher, aber propelling ist meines Erachtens falsch, das hört sich eher wie Propeller an, oder wie drehende Rotorblätter eines Helikopters. Würdest du diese Korrekturen bitte im Forum veröffentlichen, so dass diejenige Person, die das übersetzt hat, die entsprechenden Korrekturen anbringt? Wäre lieb von Dir.

Salome
Mariann

I will make the proper adjustments in the text.

--Sanjin 02:10, 22 April 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Usedname said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Upon awakening the infinite,power of wisdom is limitless. Glory be to the Creation. :)

--[[User:Usedname|Usedname]] 00:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
</div>
== Usedname said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Upon awakening the infinite,power of wisdom is limitless. Glory be to the Creation. :)

--[[User:Usedname|Usedname]] 00:53, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
</div>

Talk:Faith (Belief) and God

2011-03-11T00:43:31Z

Usedname: Comment provided by Usedname - via ArticleComments extension

Talk:How did our universe and our world come into existence?

2011-03-10T11:31:03Z

Usedname: Comment provided by Usedname - via ArticleComments extension

<noinclude>Comments on [[How did our universe and our world come into existence?]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== ory said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
How many absolute absolutums are in existence .

and absolute perfection does not exist anywere , do you agree .

--ory 05:57, 29 March 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Hawaiian said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Just my opinion, from what I can gather, the Absolute Absolution is the highest "state of BEING" reached after Creation has evolved or "obtained" the 10 to the 49th power of evolution, in which more Creation(s) are created and "adds" to the endless/timeless of a never ending "expansion" of the Absolute Absolution which "exists" in the non-space realm.

Absolute Perfection can never be "obtained", it is always evolving, and if it did reach that "stage", then evolution will cease to evolve...it is a never ending process that continues forever.

"It" or better described as

--Hawaiian 07:28, 29 March 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Suv said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Even Creation is evolving. So absolute pefection does not exists.

Even the Absolute Absolutum evolves into Ur-Absolutum, Central Absolutum, Creations Absolutum, Super Absolutum, Sohar Absolutum, BEING Absolutum and possibly many more higher Absolutum forms.

--[[User:Suv|Suv]] 17:13, 29 March 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Stuart said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Hi, I do not have a religious axe to grind, but I find the comment about being no Creator God.
If these happening are the result of 'Spiritual-Physical' processes, how can a 'Creator' not be involved. Also, this 'birthing' process was set up to behave in a particular manner. Where did it's programming come from?

Regards

--Stuart 09:45, 27 August 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Noahochoa said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
can you explain the 7 universal belts to me?

--[[User:Noahochoa|Noahochoa]] 07:47, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
</div>
== Noahochoa said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
can you explain the 7 universal belts to me?

--[[User:Noahochoa|Noahochoa]] 07:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
</div>
== Sanjin said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Stuart, something did in a sense give birth to the Creation, but the Creation itself created the visible universe from its own idea. In a similar sense, someone did give birth to you, but you are still creating your life.

Noahochoa, FIGU Bulletin #5 has a good explanation or just do a search on "belts" to see what the Plejaren say themselves.

--[[User:Sanjin|Sanjin]] 17:17, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
</div>
== Usedname said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Glory be to the Creation. :) Extremely difficult and seemingly impossible is the distribution of the truth about the almighty Creation,its laws and recommendations. Seems like my existence on Earth is amongst degenerate primates who swing on the vines of trees in a jungle of impenetrable ignorance, arrogance,and megalomania. :(

--[[User:Usedname|Usedname]] 11:31, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
</div>

Talk:Chapter 1 - INTRODUCTION

2011-03-01T03:45:34Z

Usedname: Comment provided by Usedname - via ArticleComments extension

<noinclude>Comments on [[Chapter 1 - INTRODUCTION]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== Nate said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Thank you

--Nate 17:43, 31 March 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Usedname said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Praise be to the Creation.

--[[User:Usedname|Usedname]] 03:45, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
</div>

Talk:Chapter 9 - RELIGION

2011-02-15T03:11:14Z

Usedname: Comment provided by Usedname - via ArticleComments extension

<noinclude>Comments on [[Chapter 9 - RELIGION]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== robert said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
i have knew something not about religion they are still makeing false teaching about lord jmmanuel and term creation . but i am dont know why they are . but i am golry to lord jmmmanuel and term creation

--robert 03:54, 7 April 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Usedname said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
quite frustrating it is to try and explain this to members of my family who are stuck in their false beliefs of god. god is as make believe as santa claus!

--[[User:Usedname|Usedname]] 03:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
</div>

Talk:Contact Report 006

2011-02-09T13:48:06Z

Usedname: Comment provided by Usedname - via ArticleComments extension

<noinclude>Comments on [[Contact Report 6]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== Mark said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
Thanks, this was a great help in aiding many to understand spiritual evolution including myself. I find it interesting about the organic ship and it having AI that can think and respond telepathically. This possibly could be a bonding with ship and the person that has possession of that ship. I wonder if the ship has a mind of it's own or if it has built in instructional AI geared more towards it's pilot. Very interesting. I shall now go on about and try to fulfill these stages until I get to the final boss stage. :) j/k
In reality the challenge is not surrouding us, rather it is in our own BEING that is developing by the choices we make and how it affects our future development as a whole until we all reach that Absolutum and become one with Creation. Sounds great, sign me up.

--Mark 21:27, 28 June 2010 (BST)
</div>
== newinitiation said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
So if a murderer like the Bushes and so many like-minded ilks of this sort doesn't feel any guilt for the destruction of so many people through their monstrous policies then this equates with lessons learnt given how guilt free they are.
Then people who don't necessarily feel any guilt for killing people should continue to kill people because they don't feel any guilt and don't suffer any remorse from them according to the rationale of how the creative law works.
And if people aren't harangued by their misdeeds, according to this article, the necessary lessons are learnt and thus they in their next life will not repeat the offense.
Something just doesn't make sense about this or is it my misinterpretation.

--newinitiation 04:05, 10 July 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Mark said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
I understand Bush Jr. position, remember the past when there were mighty leaders and they had fathers that had a lot of power over the will of there sons. This might have been the same case. Bush Jr. could have chosen is own path but chose to try and please his father in turn becoming his father extended through battles fought. Hopefully future generations of the Bush kin can right there wrongs and make a better future for us all with there vast reach within there party.

--Mark 20:31, 10 July 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Usedname said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
So gracious and generous are the Plejaren people to have troubled themselves to bring us this information and enlightenment of the truth from across the cosmos! thanks guys :) send ERRA my love and best regards. perhaps somehow,someway i will one day be able to visit ERRA and become aquainted with its nature and animal life. biology fascinates me

--[[User:Usedname|Usedname]] 13:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
</div>

Talk:A Word To Mankind

2011-02-07T14:37:07Z

Usedname: Comment provided by Usedname - via ArticleComments extension

<noinclude>Comments on [[A Word To Mankind]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== Usedname said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
thank you Plejaren people for providing hope that one day life on earth will be like life on Erra. spiritual conciousness and the practice of Creational laws must be recognized and practised here soon, or humankind on earth is doomed! :(

--[[User:Usedname|Usedname]] 14:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
</div>