Analysis of IIG's Meier Case explanations - Revision history

Earth Human Being: Text replacement - "extra-terrestrial" to "extraterrestrial"

2022-05-02T05:14:21Z

Text replacement - "extra-terrestrial" to "extraterrestrial"

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 2 May 2022
Line 86:		Line 86:
	IIG’S FINDINGS: Photographs Are Actually Of What Appears To Be Burning Steel Wool		IIG’S FINDINGS: Photographs Are Actually Of What Appears To Be Burning Steel Wool

	IIG also states: “This is an example of Billy Meier apparently not expecting people to know how the images in his photographs could be created and published them as "evidence" of being contact from ~~extra-terrestrials~~.”		IIG also states: “This is an example of Billy Meier apparently not expecting people to know how the images in his photographs could be created and published them as "evidence" of being contact from extraterrestrials.”

	<font color="#000099">'''A point IIG fails to mention.'''</font> I agree that IIG has presented relatively good recreations, however a point not mentioned by IIG is that this photo proves the existence of an accomplice. It seems very unlikely that Meier could, at the same time, accomplish the following actions: a) create the effect of burning static electricity and b) taking a photograph. Of course, no accomplice has been found until this day. One also wonders why would two hoaxers go through the trouble of creating this weak evidence and weaken the overall accumulation of evidence in the case?		<font color="#000099">'''A point IIG fails to mention.'''</font> I agree that IIG has presented relatively good recreations, however a point not mentioned by IIG is that this photo proves the existence of an accomplice. It seems very unlikely that Meier could, at the same time, accomplish the following actions: a) create the effect of burning static electricity and b) taking a photograph. Of course, no accomplice has been found until this day. One also wonders why would two hoaxers go through the trouble of creating this weak evidence and weaken the overall accumulation of evidence in the case?

Daniel Leech at 11:44, 15 November 2016

2016-11-15T11:44:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:44, 15 November 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[Category:Articles by others]]
			[[Category:Evidence]]
	==Background==		==Background==

J jansen: /* IIG AND METAL ANALYSIS DECONSTRUCTION */

2010-06-24T12:52:18Z

IIG AND METAL ANALYSIS DECONSTRUCTION

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:52, 24 June 2010
Line 162:		Line 162:
	==IIG AND METAL ANALYSIS DECONSTRUCTION==		==IIG AND METAL ANALYSIS DECONSTRUCTION==

	<font color="#000099">'''~~...and another false~~ claim by IIG.'''</font>		<font color="#000099">'''Misleading claim by IIG.'''</font>

	IIG writes: "All three books also state that Marcel Vogel detected the rare-Earth element Thulium using the scanning electron microscope."		IIG writes: "All three books also state that Marcel Vogel detected the rare-Earth element Thulium using the scanning electron microscope."

	Vogel reportedly used mass spectrometry and the x-ray deffraction technique to determine the elemental composition of the sample. Again anybody doing some basic research about the case will soon find out this truth. See p. 424 of Stevens' 1982 book.		Vogel reportedly used mass spectrometry and the x-ray deffraction technique to determine the elemental composition of the sample. Again anybody doing some basic research about the case will soon find out this truth. See p. 424 of Stevens' 1982 book.

J jansen: /* IIG AND METAL ANALYSIS DECONSTRUCTION */

2010-06-24T12:51:41Z

IIG AND METAL ANALYSIS DECONSTRUCTION

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:51, 24 June 2010
Line 166:		Line 166:
	IIG writes: "All three books also state that Marcel Vogel detected the rare-Earth element Thulium using the scanning electron microscope."		IIG writes: "All three books also state that Marcel Vogel detected the rare-Earth element Thulium using the scanning electron microscope."

	Vogel reportedly used mass spectrometry and the x-ray deffraction technique to determine the elemental composition of the sample. Again anybody doing some basic research about the case will soon find out this truth.		Vogel reportedly used mass spectrometry and the x-ray deffraction technique to determine the elemental composition of the sample. Again anybody doing some basic research about the case will soon find out this truth. See p. 424 of Stevens' 1982 book.

J jansen: /* IIG AND METAL ANALYSIS DECONSTRUCTION */

2010-06-24T12:51:05Z

IIG AND METAL ANALYSIS DECONSTRUCTION

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:51, 24 June 2010
Line 166:		Line 166:
	IIG writes: "All three books also state that Marcel Vogel detected the rare-Earth element Thulium using the scanning electron microscope."		IIG writes: "All three books also state that Marcel Vogel detected the rare-Earth element Thulium using the scanning electron microscope."

	Vogel reportedly used mass spectrometry to determine the elemental composition of the sample. Again		Vogel reportedly used mass spectrometry and the x-ray deffraction technique to determine the elemental composition of the sample. Again anybody doing some basic research about the case will soon find out this truth.
	anybody doing some basic research about the case will soon find out this truth.

J jansen at 12:46, 24 June 2010

2010-06-24T12:46:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:46, 24 June 2010
Line 159:		Line 159:

	The truth is that sound recordings are promoted most of the time by presenting information about the findings of engineers like Shellman and Rognerud. So the truth is that IIG selectively emphasizes this particular claim by Jim Dilettoso and ignores the more important findings about the sound recordings.		The truth is that sound recordings are promoted most of the time by presenting information about the findings of engineers like Shellman and Rognerud. So the truth is that IIG selectively emphasizes this particular claim by Jim Dilettoso and ignores the more important findings about the sound recordings.

			==IIG AND METAL ANALYSIS DECONSTRUCTION==

			<font color="#000099">'''...and another false claim by IIG.'''</font>

			IIG writes: "All three books also state that Marcel Vogel detected the rare-Earth element Thulium using the scanning electron microscope."

			Vogel reportedly used mass spectrometry to determine the elemental composition of the sample. Again
			anybody doing some basic research about the case will soon find out this truth.

J jansen: /* IIG AND THE SPACE SHIP AUDIO DECONSTRUCTION */

2010-06-24T10:15:15Z

IIG AND THE SPACE SHIP AUDIO DECONSTRUCTION

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:15, 24 June 2010
Line 158:		Line 158:
	IIG also writes: "It is these eight inaudible frequencies that Meier and his supporters use to promote the extraterrestrial nature of these audio recordings."		IIG also writes: "It is these eight inaudible frequencies that Meier and his supporters use to promote the extraterrestrial nature of these audio recordings."

	The truth is that sound recordings are promoted most of the time by presenting information about the findings of engineers like Shellman and Rognerud. So the truth is that IIG selectively emphasizes this particular claim by Jim Dilettoso and ignores the more important findings about the sound ~~recording~~		The truth is that sound recordings are promoted most of the time by presenting information about the findings of engineers like Shellman and Rognerud. So the truth is that IIG selectively emphasizes this particular claim by Jim Dilettoso and ignores the more important findings about the sound recordings.

J jansen: /* IIG AND THE SPACE SHIP AUDIO DECONSTRUCTION */

2010-06-24T10:14:29Z

IIG AND THE SPACE SHIP AUDIO DECONSTRUCTION

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:14, 24 June 2010
Line 156:		Line 156:
	The main point to notice here is that if IIG had done some basic research into the matter they would have noticed that on pp. 430-431 Wendelle Stevens writes in his Preliminary Investigation Report that there were never recorded on tape frequencies outside the human hearing range by Meier. However, these frequencies were only conjectured by Dilettoso using calculations using certain formula.		The main point to notice here is that if IIG had done some basic research into the matter they would have noticed that on pp. 430-431 Wendelle Stevens writes in his Preliminary Investigation Report that there were never recorded on tape frequencies outside the human hearing range by Meier. However, these frequencies were only conjectured by Dilettoso using calculations using certain formula.

	IIG writes: "It is these eight inaudible frequencies that Meier and his supporters use to promote the extraterrestrial nature of these audio recordings."		IIG also writes: "It is these eight inaudible frequencies that Meier and his supporters use to promote the extraterrestrial nature of these audio recordings."

	The truth is that sound recordings are promoted most of the time by presenting information about the findings of engineers like Shellman and Rognerud. So the truth is that IIG selectively emphasizes this particular claim by Jim Dilettoso and ignores the more important findings about the sound recording		The truth is that sound recordings are promoted most of the time by presenting information about the findings of engineers like Shellman and Rognerud. So the truth is that IIG selectively emphasizes this particular claim by Jim Dilettoso and ignores the more important findings about the sound recording

J jansen: /* IIG AND THE SPACE SHIP AUDIO DECONSTRUCTION */

2010-06-24T10:13:27Z

IIG AND THE SPACE SHIP AUDIO DECONSTRUCTION

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:13, 24 June 2010
Line 146:		Line 146:
	==IIG AND THE SPACE SHIP AUDIO DECONSTRUCTION==		==IIG AND THE SPACE SHIP AUDIO DECONSTRUCTION==

	IIG fails to do basic research.		<font color="#000099">'''IIG fails to do basic research.'''</font>

	IIG writes:		IIG writes:

J jansen: /* IIG AND THE SPACE SHIP AUDIO DECONSTRUCTION */

2010-06-24T10:12:15Z

IIG AND THE SPACE SHIP AUDIO DECONSTRUCTION

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:12, 24 June 2010
Line 145:		Line 145:

	==IIG AND THE SPACE SHIP AUDIO DECONSTRUCTION==		==IIG AND THE SPACE SHIP AUDIO DECONSTRUCTION==

			IIG fails to do basic research.

			IIG writes:

			CLAIM: Analysis Of The Billy Meier Space Ship Audio Recording Revealed Eight Frequencies Outside The Audible Range

			IIG’S FINDINGS: It Is Impossible For Meier To Have Recorded Audio Outside The Range Of Human Hearing

			The main point to notice here is that if IIG had done some basic research into the matter they would have noticed that on pp. 430-431 Wendelle Stevens writes in his Preliminary Investigation Report that there were never recorded on tape frequencies outside the human hearing range by Meier. However, these frequencies were only conjectured by Dilettoso using calculations using certain formula.

			IIG writes: "It is these eight inaudible frequencies that Meier and his supporters use to promote the extraterrestrial nature of these audio recordings."

			The truth is that sound recordings are promoted most of the time by presenting information about the findings of engineers like Shellman and Rognerud. So the truth is that IIG selectively emphasizes this particular claim by Jim Dilettoso and ignores the more important findings about the sound recording