Jamesm at 17:10, 2 May 2011

2011-05-02T17:10:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 2 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Recently Michael Horn and I visited a typical [http://www.alien-ufos.com Alien and UFO-related free forum] or message-board and discussed the ''Meier Case'' with the inhabitants for a few days. Unfortunately the discussion did not go very well because whenever evidence was presented by myself or Michael, the other participants in the forum kept changing the subject onto the more ''challenging'' aspects of the case. It was as if they were held the philosophy of ''"if one piece of evidence supporting the claims made by Meier was likely to be falsified, in any shape or form, then everything Meier has claimed must be also held to be false"''. This is completely illogical when one considers that when a murderer is found guilty by 9 out of 10 jurors, for example, then we must accept the decision of the 9 jurors, not the decision of the 10th juror. Multiple witness statements and the current scientific and other '''logical''' evidence was deemed to be completely and utterly unconvincing for them. Such is the primitive thinking and closed mindedness of our people at this point in time (2010). Yet it is not unsurprising looking at mankind's historical track-record of illogical and perhaps even idiotic thinking. Yet I will not explore it here right now. Perhaps another time.		Recently Michael Horn and I visited a typical [http://www.alien-ufos.com Alien and UFO-related free forum] or message-board and discussed the ''Meier Case'' with the inhabitants for a few days. Unfortunately the discussion did not go very well because whenever evidence was presented by myself or Michael, the other participants in the forum kept changing the subject onto the more ''challenging'' aspects of the case. It was as if they were held the philosophy of ''"if one piece of evidence supporting the claims made by Meier was likely to be falsified, in any shape or form, then everything Meier has claimed must be also held to be false"''. This is completely illogical when one considers that when a murderer is found guilty by 9 out of 10 jurors, for example, then we must accept the decision of the 9 jurors, not the decision of the 10th juror. Multiple witness statements and the current scientific and other '''logical''' evidence was deemed to be completely and utterly unconvincing for them. Such is the primitive thinking and closed mindedness of our people at this point in time (2010). Yet it is not unsurprising looking at mankind's historical track-record of illogical and perhaps even idiotic thinking. Yet I will not explore it here right now. Perhaps another time.
	{{wl-publish: ~~2011~~-05-~~02 18~~:09:11 +0100 \| Jamesm }}		{{wl-publish: 2010-11-24 23:06:00 +0100 \| Jamesm }}

Jamesm: Created page with "Recently Michael Horn and I visited a typical [http://www.alien-ufos.com Alien and UFO-related free forum] or message-board and discussed the ''Meier Case'' with the inhabitan..."

2011-05-02T17:09:11Z

Created page with "Recently Michael Horn and I visited a typical [http://www.alien-ufos.com Alien and UFO-related free forum] or message-board and discussed the ''Meier Case'' with the inhabitan..."

New page

Recently Michael Horn and I visited a typical [http://www.alien-ufos.com Alien and UFO-related free forum] or message-board and discussed the ''Meier Case'' with the inhabitants for a few days. Unfortunately the discussion did not go very well because whenever evidence was presented by myself or Michael, the other participants in the forum kept changing the subject onto the more ''challenging'' aspects of the case. It was as if they were held the philosophy of ''"if one piece of evidence supporting the claims made by Meier was likely to be falsified, in any shape or form, then everything Meier has claimed must be also held to be false"''. This is completely illogical when one considers that when a murderer is found guilty by 9 out of 10 jurors, for example, then we must accept the decision of the 9 jurors, not the decision of the 10th juror. Multiple witness statements and the current scientific and other '''logical''' evidence was deemed to be completely and utterly unconvincing for them. Such is the primitive thinking and closed mindedness of our people at this point in time (2010). Yet it is not unsurprising looking at mankind's historical track-record of illogical and perhaps even idiotic thinking. Yet I will not explore it here right now. Perhaps another time.
{{wl-publish: 2011-05-02 18:09:11 +0100 | Jamesm }}

Broken/Special:Badtitle/NS100:JamesMoore/A trip to a Ufology-related forum - Revision history

Jamesm at 17:10, 2 May 2011

Jamesm: Created page with "Recently Michael Horn and I visited a typical [http://www.alien-ufos.com Alien and UFO-related free forum] or message-board and discussed the ''Meier Case'' with the inhabitan..."