Moon (Earth) - Revision history

Earth Human Being: Text replacement - "http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk" to "https://www.futureofmankind.co.uk"

2022-10-20T06:39:48Z

Text replacement - "http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk" to "https://www.futureofmankind.co.uk"

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:39, 20 October 2022
Line 333:		Line 333:


	If you for some reason thought in your mind "That cannot surely be a comprehensive listing of Moon related information", you were correct. [[~~http~~://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&search=moon&fulltext=Search\| Moon centric search results]]		If you for some reason thought in your mind "That cannot surely be a comprehensive listing of Moon related information", you were correct. [[https://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&profile=default&search=moon&fulltext=Search\| Moon centric search results]]

Earth Human Being: Text replacement - "Earth humans" to "Earth-humans"

2022-04-12T20:07:25Z

Text replacement - "Earth humans" to "Earth-humans"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 12 April 2022
Line 238:		Line 238:

	<blockquote>		<blockquote>
	...nonsense sells very well to the Earth humans because many on the search for the effective truth trust and believe this false information...<br >		...nonsense sells very well to the Earth-humans because many on the search for the effective truth trust and believe this false information...<br >
	<br >		<br >
	...the truth appears too banal and therefore appears uninteresting as well as not worth knowing.<br >		...the truth appears too banal and therefore appears uninteresting as well as not worth knowing.<br >

Earth Human Being: Text replacement - "light years" to "light-years"

2022-03-02T21:40:28Z

Text replacement - "light years" to "light-years"

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:40, 2 March 2022
Line 323:		Line 323:
	astronomy in an effort to pick up signals that might have been		astronomy in an effort to pick up signals that might have been
	beamed by intelligent beings. They concentrated on a star about		beamed by intelligent beings. They concentrated on a star about
	fifteen light years away.		fifteen light-years away.

	Signals sent from Greenbank were of a kind that would show to		Signals sent from Greenbank were of a kind that would show to

Daniel Leech at 20:41, 8 November 2018

2018-11-08T20:41:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 8 November 2018
Line 39:		Line 39:
	A: Either Charles Conrad or Alan Bean.		A: Either Charles Conrad or Alan Bean.

	Non-officially, unofficially, well that is just as controversial as saying Apollo 12 was first rather that Apollo 11, we in FIGU might say it could be Billy Meier, but if not checked would say I don’t know, it could have been Jmmanuel, Mohammed or another personality in the [[Nokodemion]] lineage, or even another contactee, there are several [[Contact Reports]] which have not been translated, which may detail it.		Non-officially, unofficially, well that is just as controversial as saying Apollo 12 was first rather that Apollo 11, we in FIGU might say it could be Billy Meier, but if not checked would say I don’t know, it could have been Jmmanuel, Mohammed or another personality in the [[Nokodemion]] lineage, or even another contactee, there are several [[Contact Reports]] which have not been translated, which may detail it. There is a Contact Report which details a kidnapping / abduction, but by extraterrestrials i.e. a so-called “alien-abduction” where a terrestrial was taken some hundreds of years ago to be put on show in an extraterrestrial museum, if this is accurate then that person technically may be the first terrestrial to set foot on another planet in recent history i.e. post-[[Atlantis]] / current globalisation, since records began.

	==Earths Moons in the contact reports==		==Earths Moons in the contact reports==

Daniel Leech at 20:35, 8 November 2018

2018-11-08T20:35:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 8 November 2018
Line 34:		Line 34:

	A: Same answer and reasoning behind any conspiracy, because majority do not check. If you search Apollo hoax, most search engines and YouTube have top results which will be debunking videos that entirely ignore Apollo 11, to prove the point. The first humans to go to the moon was Apollo 12. If a hoax or debunking video has any footage outside Apollo 11, then ignore it because the persons who do not think, have for whatever reason designated the entire Apollo programme a fraud, even though there is plain evidence there are plentiful things on the moon we put there. Whether we went to the moon or not, is not the conspiracy, we went. The conspiracy is almost exclusively Apollo 11; Apollo 13 was to make it look like Apollo 11 happened.		A: Same answer and reasoning behind any conspiracy, because majority do not check. If you search Apollo hoax, most search engines and YouTube have top results which will be debunking videos that entirely ignore Apollo 11, to prove the point. The first humans to go to the moon was Apollo 12. If a hoax or debunking video has any footage outside Apollo 11, then ignore it because the persons who do not think, have for whatever reason designated the entire Apollo programme a fraud, even though there is plain evidence there are plentiful things on the moon we put there. Whether we went to the moon or not, is not the conspiracy, we went. The conspiracy is almost exclusively Apollo 11; Apollo 13 was to make it look like Apollo 11 happened.

			'''Q: Who was the first official terrestrial born, male, to set foot on another planet?'''

			A: Either Charles Conrad or Alan Bean.

			Non-officially, unofficially, well that is just as controversial as saying Apollo 12 was first rather that Apollo 11, we in FIGU might say it could be Billy Meier, but if not checked would say I don’t know, it could have been Jmmanuel, Mohammed or another personality in the [[Nokodemion]] lineage, or even another contactee, there are several [[Contact Reports]] which have not been translated, which may detail it.

	==Earths Moons in the contact reports==		==Earths Moons in the contact reports==

Daniel Leech at 20:24, 8 November 2018

2018-11-08T20:24:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 8 November 2018
Line 33:		Line 33:
	'''Q: Why do moon hoax debunked videos ignore Apollo 11 when Apollo 11 & 13 were the only frauds?'''		'''Q: Why do moon hoax debunked videos ignore Apollo 11 when Apollo 11 & 13 were the only frauds?'''

	A: Same answer and reasoning behind any conspiracy, because majority do not check. If you search Apollo hoax, most search engines and YouTube have top results which will be debunking videos that entirely ignore Apollo 11, to prove the point. The first humans to go to the moon was Apollo 12. If a hoax or debunking video has any footage outside Apollo 11 then ignore it because the persons who do not think have for whatever reason designated the entire Apollo programme a fraud even though there is plain evidence there are ~~many~~ things on the moon we put there~~, whether~~ we went to the moon or not is not the conspiracy, ~~the~~ conspiracy is almost exclusively Apollo 11; Apollo 13 was to make it look like Apollo 11 happened.		A: Same answer and reasoning behind any conspiracy, because majority do not check. If you search Apollo hoax, most search engines and YouTube have top results which will be debunking videos that entirely ignore Apollo 11, to prove the point. The first humans to go to the moon was Apollo 12. If a hoax or debunking video has any footage outside Apollo 11, then ignore it because the persons who do not think, have for whatever reason designated the entire Apollo programme a fraud, even though there is plain evidence there are plentiful things on the moon we put there. Whether we went to the moon or not, is not the conspiracy, we went. The conspiracy is almost exclusively Apollo 11; Apollo 13 was to make it look like Apollo 11 happened.

	==Earths Moons in the contact reports==		==Earths Moons in the contact reports==

Daniel Leech at 20:06, 8 November 2018

2018-11-08T20:06:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:06, 8 November 2018
Line 33:		Line 33:
	'''Q: Why do moon hoax debunked videos ignore Apollo 11 when Apollo 11 & 13 were the only frauds?'''		'''Q: Why do moon hoax debunked videos ignore Apollo 11 when Apollo 11 & 13 were the only frauds?'''

	A: Same answer and reasoning behind any conspiracy, because majority do not check. If you search Apollo hoax, most search engines and YouTube have top results which will be debunking videos that entirely ignore Apollo 11. The first humans to go to the moon was Apollo 12. If a hoax or debunking video has any footage outside Apollo 11 then ignore.		A: Same answer and reasoning behind any conspiracy, because majority do not check. If you search Apollo hoax, most search engines and YouTube have top results which will be debunking videos that entirely ignore Apollo 11, to prove the point. The first humans to go to the moon was Apollo 12. If a hoax or debunking video has any footage outside Apollo 11 then ignore it because the persons who do not think have for whatever reason designated the entire Apollo programme a fraud even though there is plain evidence there are many things on the moon we put there, whether we went to the moon or not is not the conspiracy, the conspiracy is almost exclusively Apollo 11; Apollo 13 was to make it look like Apollo 11 happened.


	==Earths Moons in the contact reports==		==Earths Moons in the contact reports==

Daniel Leech at 20:00, 8 November 2018

2018-11-08T20:00:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:00, 8 November 2018
Line 33:		Line 33:
	'''Q: Why do moon hoax debunked videos ignore Apollo 11 when Apollo 11 & 13 were the only frauds?'''		'''Q: Why do moon hoax debunked videos ignore Apollo 11 when Apollo 11 & 13 were the only frauds?'''

	A: Same answer and reasoning behind any conspiracy, because majority do not check. If you ~~type~~ Apollo hoax most search engines and YouTube ~~the~~ top results will be debunking videos ~~which~~ entirely ignore Apollo 11. The first humans to go to the moon was Apollo 12.		A: Same answer and reasoning behind any conspiracy, because majority do not check. If you search Apollo hoax, most search engines and YouTube have top results which will be debunking videos that entirely ignore Apollo 11. The first humans to go to the moon was Apollo 12. If a hoax or debunking video has any footage outside Apollo 11 then ignore.

Daniel Leech at 19:58, 8 November 2018

2018-11-08T19:58:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 8 November 2018
Line 29:		Line 29:


	~~‘’’Moon~~ FAQ and Q&~~A’’’~~<br>		'''Moon FAQ and Q&A'''<br>

	~~‘’’Q~~: Why do moon hoax debunked videos ignore Apollo 11 when Apollo 11 & 13 were the only frauds?~~’’’~~		'''Q: Why do moon hoax debunked videos ignore Apollo 11 when Apollo 11 & 13 were the only frauds?'''

	A: Same answer and reasoning behind any conspiracy, because majority do not check. If you type Apollo hoax most search engines and YouTube the top results will be debunking videos which entirely ignore Apollo 11. The first humans to go to the moon was Apollo 12.		A: Same answer and reasoning behind any conspiracy, because majority do not check. If you type Apollo hoax most search engines and YouTube the top results will be debunking videos which entirely ignore Apollo 11. The first humans to go to the moon was Apollo 12.

Daniel Leech at 19:57, 8 November 2018

2018-11-08T19:57:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 8 November 2018
Line 26:		Line 26:

	__TOC__		__TOC__



			‘’’Moon FAQ and Q&A’’’<br>

			‘’’Q: Why do moon hoax debunked videos ignore Apollo 11 when Apollo 11 & 13 were the only frauds?’’’

			A: Same answer and reasoning behind any conspiracy, because majority do not check. If you type Apollo hoax most search engines and YouTube the top results will be debunking videos which entirely ignore Apollo 11. The first humans to go to the moon was Apollo 12.