Scientific Facts And Theories Corroborated - Revision history

Daniel Leech at 07:03, 28 April 2019

2019-04-28T07:03:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:03, 28 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:Evidence]]		[[Category:Evidence]]

	It was all corroborated over the years, everything, one piece at a time, before it was discovered by scientists. We in truth became tired of writing up corroboration articles because it turned out we would have rewritten everything twice (except for the prophecies which must never happen). There were many instances where we ourselves were alerted to a new scientific discovery and instead of knowing about it before hand, delved into the ~~wrirten~~ works of [[BEAM]] to see he had already discovered it some considerable time before. What we haven’t looked into much as yet is whether new scientific discovery was instead prompted by BEAM’s profound books, rather than the other way around. We know there has been isolated efforts by the BEAM readership to interfere with the evolutionary process as an experiment to see if that could happen and found that it tended to just confuse the scientists. We also know, because it’s an open secret within this community, about the [[ageing]] and shortened life expectancy with its many ramifications including an accelerated history etc., that this has fascinated a small hard core of scientists and experts who never considered such a far reaching theory - have tried to prove various aspects of it and discover things connected to it before pre-requisite discovery etc. The truth is most of these new discoveries are long in the making, complicated and rely on large teams of scientists; take the three additional undiscovered fundamental forces of nature for example - That’s going to take hundreds of years, even if BEAM has written [[books]] about them as if they were discovered several hundred years ago instead and already with his conclusions taking into account everything.		It was all corroborated over the years, everything, one piece at a time, before it was discovered by scientists. We in truth became tired of writing up corroboration articles because it turned out we would have rewritten everything twice (except for the prophecies which must never happen). There were many instances where we ourselves were alerted to a new scientific discovery and instead of knowing about it before hand, delved into the written works of [[BEAM]] to see he had already discovered it some considerable time before. What we haven’t looked into much as yet is whether new scientific discovery was instead prompted by BEAM’s profound books, rather than the other way around. We know there has been isolated efforts by the BEAM readership to interfere with the evolutionary process as an experiment to see if that could happen and found that it tended to just confuse the scientists. We also know, because it’s an open secret within this community, about the [[ageing]] and shortened life expectancy with its many ramifications including an accelerated history etc., that this has fascinated a small hard core of scientists and experts who never considered such a far reaching theory before - have tried to prove various aspects of it and discover things connected to it before pre-requisite discovery etc. The truth is most of these new discoveries are long in the making, complicated and rely on large teams of scientists; take the three additional undiscovered fundamental forces of nature for example, dark matter, tiny particle fine-material and ultra-tiny particle fine-material - That’s going to take hundreds of years to discover, even if BEAM has written [[books]] about them as if they were discovered several hundred years ago instead and already, with his conclusions taking into account everything; thoroughly interesting gentleman. But as we have said before, Eduard cannot be credited with all this, it’s been given to him through an extensive and unprecedented education by a massive team of extraterrestrials who have many high technologies at their disposal, some of which even science-fiction artists have not dreamed.

	[[Michael Horn]]s theyflyblog is a good place to find articles written up about individual corroborations.		[[Michael Horn]]s theyflyblog is a good place to find articles written up about individual corroborations.

Daniel Leech at 06:55, 28 April 2019

2019-04-28T06:55:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 28 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:Evidence]]		[[Category:Evidence]]

	It was all corroborated over the years, everything, one piece at a time, before it was discovered by scientists. We in truth became tired of writing up corroboration articles because it turned out we would have rewritten everything twice (except for the prophecies which must never happen). There were many instances where we ourselves were alerted to a new scientific discovery and instead of knowing about it before hand, delved into the wrirten works of [[BEAM]] to see he had already discovered it some considerable time before. What we haven’t looked into much as yet is whether new scientific discovery was instead prompted by BEAM’s profound books, rather than the other way around. We know there has been isolated efforts by the BEAM readership to interfere with the evolutionary process as an experiment to see if that could happen and found that it tended to just confuse the scientists. We also know, because it’s an open secret within this community, about the [[ageing]] and shortened life expectancy with its many ramifications including an accelerated history etc., that this has fascinated a small hard core of scientists and experts who never considered such a far reaching theory - have tried to prove various aspects of it and discover things connected to it before pre-requisite discovery etc. The truth is most of these new discoveries are long in the making, complicated and rely on large teams of scientists; take the three additional undiscovered fundamental forces of nature for example - That’s going to take hundreds of years, even if BEAM has written [[books]] about them as if they were discovered several hundred years ago instead and already with his ~~conclusion~~ taking into account everything.		It was all corroborated over the years, everything, one piece at a time, before it was discovered by scientists. We in truth became tired of writing up corroboration articles because it turned out we would have rewritten everything twice (except for the prophecies which must never happen). There were many instances where we ourselves were alerted to a new scientific discovery and instead of knowing about it before hand, delved into the wrirten works of [[BEAM]] to see he had already discovered it some considerable time before. What we haven’t looked into much as yet is whether new scientific discovery was instead prompted by BEAM’s profound books, rather than the other way around. We know there has been isolated efforts by the BEAM readership to interfere with the evolutionary process as an experiment to see if that could happen and found that it tended to just confuse the scientists. We also know, because it’s an open secret within this community, about the [[ageing]] and shortened life expectancy with its many ramifications including an accelerated history etc., that this has fascinated a small hard core of scientists and experts who never considered such a far reaching theory - have tried to prove various aspects of it and discover things connected to it before pre-requisite discovery etc. The truth is most of these new discoveries are long in the making, complicated and rely on large teams of scientists; take the three additional undiscovered fundamental forces of nature for example - That’s going to take hundreds of years, even if BEAM has written [[books]] about them as if they were discovered several hundred years ago instead and already with his conclusions taking into account everything.

	[[Michael Horn]]s theyflyblog is a good place to find articles written up about individual corroborations.		[[Michael Horn]]s theyflyblog is a good place to find articles written up about individual corroborations.

Daniel Leech at 06:55, 28 April 2019

2019-04-28T06:55:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 28 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:Evidence]]		[[Category:Evidence]]

	It was all corroborated over the years, everything, one piece at a time, before it was discovered by scientists. We in truth became tired of writing up corroboration articles because it turned out we would have rewritten everything twice (except for the prophecies which must never happen). There were many instances where we ourselves were alerted to a new scientific discovery and instead of knowing about it before hand, delved into the wrirten works of [[BEAM]] to see he had already discovered it some considerable time before. What we haven’t looked into much as yet is whether new scientific discovery was instead prompted by BEAM’s profound books, rather than the other way around. We know there has been isolated efforts by the BEAM readership to interfere with the evolutionary process as an experiment to see if that could happen and found that it tended to just confuse the scientists. We also know, because it’s an open secret within this community, about the [[ageing]] and shortened life expectancy with its many ramifications including an accelerated history etc., that this has fascinated a small hard core of scientists and experts who never considered such a far reaching theory - have tried to prove various aspects of it and discover things connected to it before pre-requisite discovery etc. The truth is most of these new discoveries are long in the making, complicated and rely on large teams of scientists; take the three additional undiscovered fundamental forces of nature for example - That’s going to take hundreds of years.		It was all corroborated over the years, everything, one piece at a time, before it was discovered by scientists. We in truth became tired of writing up corroboration articles because it turned out we would have rewritten everything twice (except for the prophecies which must never happen). There were many instances where we ourselves were alerted to a new scientific discovery and instead of knowing about it before hand, delved into the wrirten works of [[BEAM]] to see he had already discovered it some considerable time before. What we haven’t looked into much as yet is whether new scientific discovery was instead prompted by BEAM’s profound books, rather than the other way around. We know there has been isolated efforts by the BEAM readership to interfere with the evolutionary process as an experiment to see if that could happen and found that it tended to just confuse the scientists. We also know, because it’s an open secret within this community, about the [[ageing]] and shortened life expectancy with its many ramifications including an accelerated history etc., that this has fascinated a small hard core of scientists and experts who never considered such a far reaching theory - have tried to prove various aspects of it and discover things connected to it before pre-requisite discovery etc. The truth is most of these new discoveries are long in the making, complicated and rely on large teams of scientists; take the three additional undiscovered fundamental forces of nature for example - That’s going to take hundreds of years, even if BEAM has written [[books]] about them as if they were discovered several hundred years ago instead and already with his conclusion taking into account everything.

	[[Michael Horn]]s theyflyblog is a good place to find articles written up about individual corroborations.		[[Michael Horn]]s theyflyblog is a good place to find articles written up about individual corroborations.

Daniel Leech at 06:51, 28 April 2019

2019-04-28T06:51:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:51, 28 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:Evidence]]		[[Category:Evidence]]

	It was all corroborated over the years, everything, one piece at a time, before it was discovered by scientists. We in truth became tired of writing up corroboration articles because it turned out we would have rewritten everything twice (except for the prophecies which must never happen). There were many instances where we ourselves were alerted to a new scientific discovery and instead of knowing about it before hand, delved into the wrirten works of [[BEAM]] to see he had already discovered it some considerable time before. What we haven’t looked into much as yet is whether new scientific discovery was instead prompted by BEAM’s profound books, rather than the other way around. We know there has been isolated efforts by the BEAM readership to interfere with the evolutionary process as an experiment to see if that could happen and found that it tended to just confuse the scientists. We also know, because it’s an open secret within this community, about the [[ageing]] and shortened life expectancy with its many ramifications including ~~and~~ accelerated history etc., that this has fascinated a small hard core of scientists who never considered such a far reaching theory - have tried to prove various aspects and discover things connected to it, before discovery etc. The truth is most of these new discoveries are long in the making, complicated and rely on large teams of scientists.		It was all corroborated over the years, everything, one piece at a time, before it was discovered by scientists. We in truth became tired of writing up corroboration articles because it turned out we would have rewritten everything twice (except for the prophecies which must never happen). There were many instances where we ourselves were alerted to a new scientific discovery and instead of knowing about it before hand, delved into the wrirten works of [[BEAM]] to see he had already discovered it some considerable time before. What we haven’t looked into much as yet is whether new scientific discovery was instead prompted by BEAM’s profound books, rather than the other way around. We know there has been isolated efforts by the BEAM readership to interfere with the evolutionary process as an experiment to see if that could happen and found that it tended to just confuse the scientists. We also know, because it’s an open secret within this community, about the [[ageing]] and shortened life expectancy with its many ramifications including an accelerated history etc., that this has fascinated a small hard core of scientists and experts who never considered such a far reaching theory - have tried to prove various aspects of it and discover things connected to it before pre-requisite discovery etc. The truth is most of these new discoveries are long in the making, complicated and rely on large teams of scientists; take the three additional undiscovered fundamental forces of nature for example - That’s going to take hundreds of years.

	[[Michael Horn]]s theyflyblog is a good place to find articles written up about individual corroborations.		[[Michael Horn]]s theyflyblog is a good place to find articles written up about individual corroborations.

Daniel Leech at 06:47, 28 April 2019

2019-04-28T06:47:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:47, 28 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:Evidence]]		[[Category:Evidence]]

	It was all corroborated over the years, everything, one piece at a time, before it was discovered by scientists. We in truth became tired of writing up ~~corrobation~~ articles because it turned out we would have rewritten everything twice (except for the prophecies which must never happen). There were many instances where we ourselves were alerted to a new scientific discovery and instead of knowing about it before hand, delved into the wrirten works of [[BEAM]] to see he had already discovered it some considerable time before. What we haven’t looked into much as yet is whether new scientific discovery was instead prompted by BEAM’s profound books, rather than the other way around. We know there has been isolated efforts by the BEAM readership to interfere with the evolutionary process as an experiment to see if that could happen and found that it tended to just confuse the scientists. We also know, because it’s an open secret within this community, about the [[ageing]] and shortened life expectancy with its many ramifications including and accelerated history etc., that this has fascinated a small hard core of scientists who never considered such a far reaching theory - have tried to prove various aspects and discover things connected to it, before discovery etc. The truth is most of these new discoveries are long in the making, complicated and rely on large teams of scientists.		It was all corroborated over the years, everything, one piece at a time, before it was discovered by scientists. We in truth became tired of writing up corroboration articles because it turned out we would have rewritten everything twice (except for the prophecies which must never happen). There were many instances where we ourselves were alerted to a new scientific discovery and instead of knowing about it before hand, delved into the wrirten works of [[BEAM]] to see he had already discovered it some considerable time before. What we haven’t looked into much as yet is whether new scientific discovery was instead prompted by BEAM’s profound books, rather than the other way around. We know there has been isolated efforts by the BEAM readership to interfere with the evolutionary process as an experiment to see if that could happen and found that it tended to just confuse the scientists. We also know, because it’s an open secret within this community, about the [[ageing]] and shortened life expectancy with its many ramifications including and accelerated history etc., that this has fascinated a small hard core of scientists who never considered such a far reaching theory - have tried to prove various aspects and discover things connected to it, before discovery etc. The truth is most of these new discoveries are long in the making, complicated and rely on large teams of scientists.

	[[Michael Horn]]s theyflyblog is a good place to find articles written up about individual corroborations.		[[Michael Horn]]s theyflyblog is a good place to find articles written up about individual corroborations.

Daniel Leech at 06:46, 28 April 2019

2019-04-28T06:46:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 28 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:Evidence]]		[[Category:Evidence]]

			It was all corroborated over the years, everything, one piece at a time, before it was discovered by scientists. We in truth became tired of writing up corrobation articles because it turned out we would have rewritten everything twice (except for the prophecies which must never happen). There were many instances where we ourselves were alerted to a new scientific discovery and instead of knowing about it before hand, delved into the wrirten works of [[BEAM]] to see he had already discovered it some considerable time before. What we haven’t looked into much as yet is whether new scientific discovery was instead prompted by BEAM’s profound books, rather than the other way around. We know there has been isolated efforts by the BEAM readership to interfere with the evolutionary process as an experiment to see if that could happen and found that it tended to just confuse the scientists. We also know, because it’s an open secret within this community, about the [[ageing]] and shortened life expectancy with its many ramifications including and accelerated history etc., that this has fascinated a small hard core of scientists who never considered such a far reaching theory - have tried to prove various aspects and discover things connected to it, before discovery etc. The truth is most of these new discoveries are long in the making, complicated and rely on large teams of scientists.

			[[Michael Horn]]s theyflyblog is a good place to find articles written up about individual corroborations.


	==Articles==		==Articles==
	* [[Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion]]		* [[Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion]]

Jamesm: Replaced content with "Category:Evidence ==Articles== * Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion"

2015-02-28T19:21:05Z

Replaced content with "Category:Evidence ==Articles== * Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion"

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 28 February 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Articles==		==Articles==
	* [[Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion]]		* [[Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion]]

	~~==Featured Media==~~

	Watch these video presentations of scientific and related facts and theories published by FIGU that were later corroborated by Our sciences and reports in media, thus proving that either Eduard Meier is a genius in multiple fields of science or that he obtained the information from a technically advanced source. Coupled with all of the other forms of freely available evidence, the most logical conclusion is that the sources were extraterrestrial in nature.

	~~All videos produced by Karumudi Mahesh Chowdary(KMC).~~

	Note: '''''After the uploading of these videos on Youtube, my(KMC) new research indicated to me that there are a few changes to be made to the years of corroboration or the article that is being corroborated. More updated work will be available soon as videos or else you can go through the updated work at - 'Will Humanity Wake Up…In Time?' page.

	~~===Corroborations found for 2006===~~
	~~<mediaplayer bufferlength='10' width='800' height='600'>File:Corroborated2006.flv</mediaplayer>~~

	~~===Corroborations found for 2007===~~
	~~<mediaplayer bufferlength='10' width='800' height='600'>File:Corroborated2007.mp4</mediaplayer>~~

	~~===Corroborations found for 2008===~~
	~~<mediaplayer bufferlength='10' width='800' height='600'>File:Corroborated2008.flv</mediaplayer>~~

	~~===Corroborations found for 2009===~~
	~~====Part 1====~~
	~~<mediaplayer bufferlength='10' width='800' height='600'>File:Corroborated2009.flv</mediaplayer>~~
	~~====Part 2====~~
	~~<mediaplayer bufferlength='10' width='800' height='600'>File:Corroborated2009pt2.flv</mediaplayer>~~

	~~===Corroborations found for 2010===~~
	~~====Part 1====~~
	~~<mediaplayer bufferlength='10' width='800' height='600'>File:Corroborated2010pt1.flv</mediaplayer>~~
	~~====Part 2====~~
	~~<mediaplayer bufferlength='10' width='800' height='600'>File:Corroborated2010pt2.flv</mediaplayer>~~

	~~===Corroborations found for 2011===~~
	~~<mediaplayer bufferlength='10' width='800' height='600'>File:Corroborated2011.flv</mediaplayer>~~

	~~===Additional corroborations found for 2009 to 2011===~~
	~~<mediaplayer bufferlength='10' width='800' height='600'>File:Corroborated2009to2011.mp4</mediaplayer>~~

Jamesm: /* Articles */

2015-02-28T19:20:45Z

Articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, 28 February 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Articles==		==Articles==
	* [[Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion]]		* [[Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion]]
	* [[Will Humanity Wake Up...In Time?\|Will Humanity Wake Up...In Time?]] - A collection of 150+ scientific and other facts & theories corroborated later by sciences & news articles in media
	* [http://www.prweb.com//releases/2011/8/prweb8755972.htm National Geographic Article, New Science Journal Study Confirm Billy Meier Information on Prehistoric Humans]

	==Featured Media==		==Featured Media==

Jamesm: /* Articles */

2013-09-13T20:55:37Z

Articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 13 September 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Articles==		==Articles==
	* [[Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion]]		* [[Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion]]
	* [[Will Humanity Wake ~~Up…In~~ Time?\|Will Humanity Wake ~~Up…In~~ Time? - A collection of 150+ scientific and other facts & theories corroborated later by sciences & news articles in media]]		* [[Will Humanity Wake Up...In Time?\|Will Humanity Wake Up...In Time?]] - A collection of 150+ scientific and other facts & theories corroborated later by sciences & news articles in media
	* [http://www.prweb.com//releases/2011/8/prweb8755972.htm National Geographic Article, New Science Journal Study Confirm Billy Meier Information on Prehistoric Humans]		* [http://www.prweb.com//releases/2011/8/prweb8755972.htm National Geographic Article, New Science Journal Study Confirm Billy Meier Information on Prehistoric Humans]

Mahigitam: /* Articles */

2012-10-19T09:32:48Z

Articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:32, 19 October 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Articles==		==Articles==
	* [[Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion]]		* [[Prior Knowledge Of Major Ozone Depletion]]
	* [[Will Humanity Wake Up…In Time?\|Will Humanity Wake Up…In Time? - A collection of 150+ scientific & other facts & theories corroborated later by sciences & news articles in media]]		* [[Will Humanity Wake Up…In Time?\|Will Humanity Wake Up…In Time? - A collection of 150+ scientific and other facts & theories corroborated later by sciences & news articles in media]]
	* [http://www.prweb.com//releases/2011/8/prweb8755972.htm National Geographic Article, New Science Journal Study Confirm Billy Meier Information on Prehistoric Humans]		* [http://www.prweb.com//releases/2011/8/prweb8755972.htm National Geographic Article, New Science Journal Study Confirm Billy Meier Information on Prehistoric Humans]