Talk:Biography - Revision history

Jamesm at 10:50, 16 January 2011

2011-01-16T10:50:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:50, 16 January 2011
Line 36:		Line 36:

	<div class='commentBlock'>		<div class='commentBlock'>
	Edinachman, you missed out Mohammed / Muhammad between Jmmanuel and Billy (see [[Prophets]]). The main thing about people who say Billy was incarnated as someone called Jesus is that it is simply not true because Jesus did not exist. I'm talking about the name Jesus. It is just accurate to say that "Billy's spirit form was previously incarnated as the personality called Jmmanuel, known falsely today as Jesus Christ". Where is the evidence for this? I feel that the evidence is a logical deduction from a multitude of various other pieces of evidences, available here and elsewhere.		Edinachman, you missed out Mohammed / Muhammad between Jmmanuel and Billy (see [[Prophets]]). The main thing about people who say Billy was incarnated as someone called Jesus is that it is simply not true because Jesus did not exist. I'm talking about the name Jesus. It is just accurate to say that "Billy's spirit form was previously incarnated as the personality called Jmmanuel, known falsely today as Jesus Christ". Where is the evidence for this? I feel that the evidence is a logical deduction from a multitude of various other pieces of evidences, available here and elsewhere. As for the other personalities you mentioned, "I dont know" is the answer but I haven't read all the books, booklets, contact reports and other pieces of info yet so the answer could still be within your reach.

	--[[User:Jamesm\|Jamesm]] 10:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)		--[[User:Jamesm\|Jamesm]] 10:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Jamesm: Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension

2011-01-16T10:46:52Z

Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:46, 16 January 2011
Line 32:		Line 32:

	--[[User:Edinachman\|Edinachman]] 08:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)		--[[User:Edinachman\|Edinachman]] 08:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
			</div>
			== Jamesm said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Edinachman, you missed out Mohammed / Muhammad between Jmmanuel and Billy (see [[Prophets]]). The main thing about people who say Billy was incarnated as someone called Jesus is that it is simply not true because Jesus did not exist. I'm talking about the name Jesus. It is just accurate to say that "Billy's spirit form was previously incarnated as the personality called Jmmanuel, known falsely today as Jesus Christ". Where is the evidence for this? I feel that the evidence is a logical deduction from a multitude of various other pieces of evidences, available here and elsewhere.

			--[[User:Jamesm\|Jamesm]] 10:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Edinachman: Comment provided by Edinachman - via ArticleComments extension

2011-01-15T08:55:56Z

Comment provided by Edinachman - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:55, 15 January 2011
Line 25:		Line 25:

	--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 05:02, 8 October 2010 (BST)		--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 05:02, 8 October 2010 (BST)
			</div>
			== Edinachman said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			When I read that Jmmanuel was the 5th incarnation and Billy Meier was the 6th incarnation, I assumed Billy was claiming to be an incarnation of the same being as Jmmanuel (Jesus Christ?), what is the truth of the matter if this thought is a "dispicable imputation"? If Henoch,Elia, Jesaja, Jeremiah an Jmmanuel are the genuine prophets what is billy's attitude to Hosea, Micah, Joel and the other minor prophets and Ezekiel?

			--[[User:Edinachman\|Edinachman]] 08:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Markvd: Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

2010-10-08T04:02:32Z

Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:02, 8 October 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:

	--[[User:Sanjin\|Sanjin]] 04:19, 8 October 2010 (BST)		--[[User:Sanjin\|Sanjin]] 04:19, 8 October 2010 (BST)
			</div>
			== Markvd said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Thanks for the info Sanjin although I would think of flowers as women and men as something different like cave men.:)

			--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 05:02, 8 October 2010 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Sanjin: Comment provided by Sanjin - via ArticleComments extension

2010-10-08T03:19:59Z

Comment provided by Sanjin - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:19, 8 October 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 22:02, 7 October 2010 (BST)		--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 22:02, 7 October 2010 (BST)
			</div>
			== Sanjin said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Markvd, the spirit does not have a gender at all. Not even your spirit has a male or female sex. It's the body that takes on differently polarized sexes and traits, which is determined by the DNA, hormones, etc..

			Did you know that many flowers actually contain both male and female sexual organs?

			--[[User:Sanjin\|Sanjin]] 04:19, 8 October 2010 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Markvd: Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

2010-10-07T21:02:46Z

Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

New page

<noinclude>Comments on [[Biography]]
<comments />
----- __NOEDITSECTION__</noinclude>

== Markvd said ... ==

<div class='commentBlock'>
I am trying to understand the Nokodemion line as multiple reincarnations of the same spirit in different material bodies or the 7 prophets. I remember reading about when in pure spiritual form you are neither man or woman but a whole being thus Billy is part of a whole or am I lost in space. :)

--[[User:Markvd|Markvd]] 22:02, 7 October 2010 (BST)
</div>