Talk:Contact Report 112 - Revision history

Alive: Comment provided by I - via ArticleComments extension

2011-11-03T04:03:39Z

Comment provided by I - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:03, 3 November 2011
Line 139:		Line 139:

	--[[User:Benjamin\|βενιαμιν]] 15:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)		--[[User:Benjamin\|βενιαμιν]] 15:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
			</div>
			== I said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			In ancient time, only male Earth human life forms were allowed to perform solo dance and solo singing, female Earth human life forms could only dance in group and sing in choir. The invention of belly dance revolutionized the old custom and liberated female Earth dancers from the domination of male Earth dancers, male spectators, and male dance critics. I hold my tears everytime I watched a slim performing belly dancer, since I know that I was watching the legacy of ancient female dancers's struggle to become the masters of their own beauties.

			--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 04:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Benjamin: Comment provided by Benjamin Stevens - via ArticleComments extension

2011-11-02T15:00:19Z

Comment provided by Benjamin Stevens - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 2 November 2011
Line 132:		Line 132:

	--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 06:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)		--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 06:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
			</div>
			== Benjamin Stevens said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Just watching that extremely feminine dance genre on youtube is a very efficient "psyche liberating activity," if you ask me. :-)

			--[[User:Benjamin\|βενιαμιν]] 15:00, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Barbarian216: Comment provided by Hawaiian - via ArticleComments extension

2011-11-02T06:12:08Z

Comment provided by Hawaiian - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:12, 2 November 2011
Line 120:		Line 120:

	--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 06:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)		--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 06:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
			</div>
			== Hawaiian said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Alive,

			Thinking about losing some extra pounds, check out Richard Simmons dancing workout? Just looking at all those obese women who shouldn’t be eating fatty foods and not exercising enough maybe they should help out on Billy’s farm pulling a plow instead of jumping around in some air conditioned room?

			http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na9ZZ4ZjVa8


			--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 06:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Alive: Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension

2011-11-01T06:35:35Z

Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:35, 1 November 2011
Line 111:		Line 111:

	--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 08:51, 31 October 2011 (UTC)		--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 08:51, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
			</div>
			== Alive said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Some dance genres are extremely feminine that they should not be performed by male Earth human life forms in any circumstances, such as this one:

			http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0oRsrNCkfc&feature=related

			--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 06:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Barbarian216: Comment provided by Hawaiian - via ArticleComments extension

2011-10-31T08:51:20Z

Comment provided by Hawaiian - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:51, 31 October 2011
Line 82:		Line 82:

	--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 03:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)		--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 03:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
			</div>
			== Hawaiian said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Accordingly to Wilikipedia, fag or faggot is actually an American slang for gay men, which derived from the British idea of “Queer”, see link.


			http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer

			http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faggot_%28slang%29



			It appears that both Semjase and Billy do not approve of male dancing and to further this enquirer, please look at FIGU Bulletin 69 below which speaks of one’s evolutionary level being dependent on our previous personalities that have matured significantly (highest possible level of the innermost), thus in other words “highest potential” whether male or female specific attributes. One has to be consciously certain of their gender characteristic and not have second thoughts in their current material mindset.

			Therefore if some form of confusion regarding gender specific characteristics are present, whether a human male thinks or acts in a feminine nature, it causes some type of non-harmonic energy interchange between the conscious and subconscious since a male is slightly positive while a female is negative, one has to be certain and not disrupt this energy flow which is gender specific (at least on a material consciousness realm). If the present personality does not resolve or merge back into its specific male oriented characteristics, it becomes a problem for the next incarnation personality.

			Another problem of homosexuality is based on the unnatural “sleep cycle” between incarnations which on Earth is normally around 150 years, but because of overpopulation this cycle period is cut short as much as 30 years in the ether before incarnating again.


			I believe the only evolutionary level where there is no distinction between a male and female attributes is at the Petale level where both are finally merged as ONE so that its evolutionary combinations become necessary in order to enter into the Absolute realm before creating more universes since the spirit is sexless by nature, neither male or female, but a unity of both.


			FIGU Bulletin 69

			Destination of the human-consciousness-evolution is to harmonize the external and internal self with the human’s relatively highest possible level of the innermost, creative self (spirit-form). Our individual evolutionary level is of course decisive, depending on whether or not our predecessor-personalities – and now we for the ones who come after us – recognized their responsibility and evolutionised in consciousness as far as possible in a creational sense. If not, our inner self is not congeneric (like-natured) with the innermost self or in other words with the knowledge, love and wisdom impulses of Creation, which flow via our spirit-form into our sub consciousness and on into our consciousness, where we – upon seizing them after they have passed through the censor – continue to work with them in our thoughts and feelings and to direct our inner according to them – at best.


			--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 08:51, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Alive: Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension

2011-10-31T03:56:06Z

Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:56, 31 October 2011
Line 75:		Line 75:

	--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 02:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)		--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 02:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
			</div>
			== Alive said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			On Earth dancing is not only entertainment and sport but also an efficient psyche liberating activity, I do not know how it is on other planets.

			--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 03:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Markvd: Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

2011-10-30T02:27:31Z

Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 30 October 2011
Line 68:		Line 68:

	--[[User:Sheila\|Sheila]] 15:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Sheila\|Sheila]] 15:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
			</div>
			== Markvd said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			I find that quite funny about dancing man, I enjoy dancing myself but now I know how to deflect opposing races of beings around the cosmos in case of battle. In the teaching of spirit however it says for those that understand it a little further are neither male nor female and one spirit. I wonder how that fits into the equation of dance if it only favors the female, would that not negate one pure spirit form. :)

			--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 02:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Sheila: Comment provided by Sheila - via ArticleComments extension

2010-11-09T15:34:17Z

Comment provided by Sheila - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 9 November 2010
Line 61:		Line 61:

	--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 03:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 03:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
			</div>
			== Sheila said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Hey Alive, just using YOUR WORDS against you. Because of that you think I hate them? LOL. Take as long as you like to reply, as I see it is you that needs to learn empathy. It wasn't me that had a fantasy about destroying them. You really ought to read the Goblet of Truth.

			--[[User:Sheila\|Sheila]] 15:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Alive: Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension

2010-11-09T03:39:52Z

Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:39, 9 November 2010
Line 45:		Line 45:

	There are events in which all participants should dance, whether rhytmically or not. Standing still could be considered as a hostile stance. People's willingness to dance for awhile is like willingness to shake hands. It does not necessarily mean to show friendship, but to show no hostility toward other person.		There are events in which all participants should dance, whether rhytmically or not. Standing still could be considered as a hostile stance. People's willingness to dance for awhile is like willingness to shake hands. It does not necessarily mean to show friendship, but to show no hostility toward other person.



			--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 03:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
			</div>
			== Alive said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Sheila,
			Thank you for your comment. Please give me several billions years to reply it well. By the way, your hope that I will be reincarnated as a faggot implicitly showed that for you a faggot is something disgusting. Although you tried to show me your empathy for faggots, yet your words only showed me your hatred for them.

Alive: Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension

2010-11-09T03:39:01Z

Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:39, 9 November 2010
Line 29:		Line 29:

	--[[User:Sheila\|Sheila]] 22:23, 4 November 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Sheila\|Sheila]] 22:23, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
			</div>
			== Alive said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Mark AKA Markvd,
			Dancing will not make you feminine as long as you don't wear violet breastholder, pink stockings, and lime green high heels. Dancing is not a feminine action, just as singing is not a masculine action. Anthropologically speaking, dancing rhytmically is a part of the opening and closing rites related to some tribal activitities, such as food gathering (fruits picking and animals hunting), crops planting, crops harvesting, cattles slaying, wedding, fighting against another tribe, and deads burying or burning. Dancing rhytmically raises tribe members's awareness and excitement, so they would feel energized and get ready to conduct the related activity, such as get ready to plant the crops, get ready to harvest, get ready to fight, and so on (in the case of a wedding rite, I really don't know get ready to what, it is still a mistery for me).

			So there are various dances for various rites. A dance consists of various movements, which some of them imitate the movements of certain activities, for example dance movements which imitate hunting a boar, movements which imitate planting crops, movements imitate fighting with clubs, and so on (I strongly believe that there is no movement which imitate making babies). In their developments, the dance movements were modified over and over until we could not easily guess what tribal activities they imitate. Then later tribal people made new dances which are combinations of dances from different rites just for fun, to be performed as mere entertainments. Tribal dances are performed by man and woman together. For tribal people dancing is not feminine nor masculine action. It is something which is done by man and woman together, introduced and developed together over thousands of years, trillions of years, or what have you.

			In a heterosexual adults surrounding, a dancing man could attract women's attentions because they saw a moving male's body. In the same surrounding, a dancing woman could attract men's attentions because they saw a moving female's body. A fisherman in a fishery tribe dances in an opening rite of a fishing season could make the women of the tribe get aroused, even if he doesn't mean to seduce them. A beautiful peasant woman in an agricultural tribe dances in a closing rite of a harvesting season could make the men of the tribe get aroused and leave their religion spontaneously, even if she doesn't mean to seduce those pathetic men. In a homosexual adult surrounding, the case would be quite different, which Sheila would be the best person to explain it to you in details.

			By the way, dancing rhytmically is not only done by humans. Some animals, such as parrot and cobra, react to rhytmic sounds by dancing rhytmically. My laziness hinders me to find out why is that.

			In a patriarchal royal court women danced more often than men, because men considered as the masters who should be entertained by dancing women. In a matriarchal royal court the opposite would be the case. Outside the royal courts, especially in the neighborhoods of peasants and proletariats men danced as often and as lively as women did. They entertained each other by their moves and facial expressions. By watching the dances of humans in various surroundings we could get some glimpses of the interpersonal equality between sexes, which are male and female, excluding the faggot, because faggot is not a sex type (in fact I have no idea how we should categorize this phenomenon).

			There are events in which all participants should dance, whether rhytmically or not. Standing still could be considered as a hostile stance. People's willingness to dance for awhile is like willingness to shake hands. It does not necessarily mean to show friendship, but to show no hostility toward other person.



			--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 03:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>