Talk:Contact Report 125 - Revision history

Daniel Leech at 17:14, 29 September 2016

2016-09-29T17:14:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:14, 29 September 2016
Line 199:		Line 199:

	Someone named Sastron Aulander was heckled on theyflyblog in September 2016. They used 'tron' as a way of misapplying abuses to him. I searched this name and this contact came up and Sastron = The Treating Man is listed.		Someone named Sastron Aulander was heckled on theyflyblog in September 2016. They used 'tron' as a way of misapplying abuses to him. I searched this name and this contact came up and Sastron = The Treating Man is listed.

			I think this was disrespectful.

Daniel Leech at 17:12, 29 September 2016

2016-09-29T17:12:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 29 September 2016
Line 196:		Line 196:
	</div>		</div>

	== ~~Sastron Aulander~~ ==		== Daniel Said... ==

	Someone named Sastron Aulander was heckled on theyflyblog in September 2016. They used 'tron' as a way of misapplying abuses to him. I searched this name and this contact came up and Sastron = The Treating Man is listed.		Someone named Sastron Aulander was heckled on theyflyblog in September 2016. They used 'tron' as a way of misapplying abuses to him. I searched this name and this contact came up and Sastron = The Treating Man is listed.

Daniel Leech: /* Sastron Aulander */ new section

2016-09-29T17:10:46Z

Sastron Aulander: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 29 September 2016
Line 195:		Line 195:
	--[[User:Wolverine\|Wolverine]] 23:47, 24 August 2012 (BST)		--[[User:Wolverine\|Wolverine]] 23:47, 24 August 2012 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

			== Sastron Aulander ==

			Someone named Sastron Aulander was heckled on theyflyblog in September 2016. They used 'tron' as a way of misapplying abuses to him. I searched this name and this contact came up and Sastron = The Treating Man is listed.

Wolverine: Comment provided by Wolverine - via ArticleComments extension

2012-08-24T22:47:37Z

Comment provided by Wolverine - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, 24 August 2012
Line 187:		Line 187:

	--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 19:32, 5 October 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 19:32, 5 October 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Wolverine said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			I wonder what means 'Semjase'?

			--[[User:Wolverine\|Wolverine]] 23:47, 24 August 2012 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Barbarian216: Comment provided by Barbarian216 - via ArticleComments extension

2011-10-05T18:32:08Z

Comment provided by Barbarian216 - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 5 October 2011
Line 178:		Line 178:

	--[[User:Zameen\|Zameen]] 05:36, 14 September 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Zameen\|Zameen]] 05:36, 14 September 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Barbarian216 said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Zameen,

			I'm just docking this post forward and will respond soon as the material was worked on but pushed back because of another priority project.

			--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 19:32, 5 October 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Zameen: Comment provided by Zameen - via ArticleComments extension

2011-09-14T04:36:35Z

Comment provided by Zameen - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:36, 14 September 2011
Line 164:		Line 164:

	--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 04:38, 14 September 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 04:38, 14 September 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Zameen said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Hawaiian-thank you for your possible clarification on this matter. It was my idea that since it was not reccomended to try and access spirits in their "other world", that everyday plejarens would not use these means for the naming process. So there is your rather complicated sounding approach, which boiled down to a process, has its merits, but at the same time it begs the question: "Are you and Mr. Cleese aka, Alive, proposing a similar process?

			--[[User:Zameen\|Zameen]] 05:36, 14 September 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>
	== Zameen said ... ==		== Zameen said ... ==

Zameen: Comment provided by Zameen - via ArticleComments extension

2011-09-14T04:36:25Z

Comment provided by Zameen - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:36, 14 September 2011
Line 164:		Line 164:

	--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 04:38, 14 September 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 04:38, 14 September 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Zameen said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Hawaiian-thank you for your possible clarification on this matter. It was my idea that since it was not reccomended to try and access spirits in their "other world", that everyday plejarens would not use these means for the naming process. So there is your rather complicated sounding approach, which boiled down to a process, has its merits, but at the same time it begs the question: "Are you and Mr. Cleese aka, Alive, proposing a similar process?

			--[[User:Zameen\|Zameen]] 05:36, 14 September 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Alive: Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension

2011-09-14T03:38:43Z

Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 14 September 2011
Line 155:		Line 155:

	--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 02:47, 14 September 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 02:47, 14 September 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Alive said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Lord Zameen,

			I assume that the mentioned names are metaphors. They are not titles of professions or ranks. They were composed to stimulate Earth human life forms's brains to think about ethical values related to the names. The name "Gralon" (The Man who Makes Bowls), for example, is not intended to be used by bowl makers (bowl craftsmen). Anyone could use a name if he likes it, if he feels in tune with the name and its related ethical values, even if his profession has nothing to do with bowl production and he did not come from a bowl makers family or bowl collectors family. I assume it has nothing to do with birth, occupation, and tendency of the person who picked the name, my Lord.

			--[[User:Alive\|-- M --]] 04:38, 14 September 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Markvd: Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

2011-09-14T01:47:21Z

Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:47, 14 September 2011
Line 148:		Line 148:

	--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 20:42, 13 September 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 20:42, 13 September 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Markvd said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			That's cool, but what if a name is tough to match a person, would they be the unfathomable one or the question with a answer, the endless curiosity, the prolonged endurance. I seem to match these newly adopted names to a majority of Earth humanity. Each planet should only allow the population amount to match the names so overpopulation cannot prevail. :)

			--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 02:47, 14 September 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Barbarian216: Comment provided by Hawaiian - via ArticleComments extension

2011-09-13T19:42:17Z

Comment provided by Hawaiian - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 13 September 2011
Line 134:		Line 134:

	--[[User:Zameen\|Zameen]] 16:02, 13 September 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Zameen\|Zameen]] 16:02, 13 September 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Hawaiian said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Aloha Zameen, my friend,

			You have a good point, I think there are two avenues of approaches, the fortunate ones with the technological means to validate one’s potentials and match their attributes to a proper name representation through historical data and time shifted analysis along with past and current personality integration values with its appropriate links to other non-related personalities it may have influenced both positively and/or negatively.

			These traits are then incorporated into whether the person is born on a certain date to a particular couple whose attributes are also considered will have bearing on which name is most appropriate for its gender be it male or female. During a forum discussion one person mentioned that some Plejaren couples have given birth to a baby that has already evolved into a half physical spiritual Being, but whether true or not has to be verified.

			Then, unfortunately those without these measures have to rely on genealogical family tree and historical data to determine which name is properly chosen or that person will need to change their name to something more appropriate.


			--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 20:42, 13 September 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>