Talk:Contact Report 424 - Revision history

Level4: Comment provided by Level4 - via ArticleComments extension

2012-02-22T20:20:13Z

Comment provided by Level4 - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 22 February 2012
Line 178:		Line 178:

	--[[User:Level4\|Level4]] 19:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)		--[[User:Level4\|Level4]] 19:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
			</div>
			== Level4 said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			furthermore..

			there are dozens of proven(!) cases where people - claimed abductees - had implants removed for the bodies documented on video (google "Dr.Roger Leir" for example).
			those videos were sent to special laboratories to determine their consistence, without telling the testers where the objects came from.
			and in ALL of the cases the results said that the implants contained elements that were only found in asteroid/meteroid samples so far!

			to say the least, both of the stories we're dealing here might be a big hoax, but i do believe that both are not.

			considering this, i have the strong opinion that Ptaah is not quite saying the truth in this report.


			--[[User:Level4\|Level4]] 20:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Level4: Comment provided by Level4 - via ArticleComments extension

2012-02-22T19:47:28Z

Comment provided by Level4 - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 22 February 2012
Line 168:		Line 168:

	--[[User:J rod7\|J rod7]] 17:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)		--[[User:J rod7\|J rod7]] 17:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
			</div>
			== Level4 said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			in report number 37 "semjase" gives entirely different information about the betty and barney hill case!
			if the case was a hoax, fraud or a simple hallucination by said couple, how and why would "semjase" confirm that those aliens came from the system of zeta reticuli, since this information came from betty hill in the first place, by drawing a starmap out of her recollation under hypnosis?!

			i'm not asking this for debunking reasons, i would just like to be updated if i missed something out here?!

			--[[User:Level4\|Level4]] 19:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

J rod7: Comment provided by J rod7 - via ArticleComments extension

2011-11-27T17:28:39Z

Comment provided by J rod7 - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 27 November 2011
Line 161:		Line 161:

	--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 22:46, 11 October 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 22:46, 11 October 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== J rod7 said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			In respect to the comment from Ptaah: "...the unique occurrence in Brazil regarding the Alpha Centauri-contact...," is reference to the planet Acart (Akart) and the contacts in Brazil with Artur Berlet. Ptaah tells us this is (were) true contacts, then Billy tells us that the book written by Wendelle Stevens about this case is not true. This contradiction needs to be clarified.

			--[[User:J rod7\|J rod7]] 17:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
	</div>		</div>

Markvd: Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

2011-10-11T21:46:14Z

Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:46, 11 October 2011
Line 154:		Line 154:

	--[[User:Mrnorm\|Mrnorm]] 21:57, 11 October 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Mrnorm\|Mrnorm]] 21:57, 11 October 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Markvd said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			If everybody does something within there capability then we will get there sooner rather than later. It truly is a team effort in order to bring balance to society. I just hope we find that knowledge is the true meaning of life and it's purpose rather than materials controlling the mind. If we get over that hurdle we will see better days.

			--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 22:46, 11 October 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Mrnorm: Comment provided by Mrnorm - via ArticleComments extension

2011-10-11T20:57:06Z

Comment provided by Mrnorm - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 11 October 2011
Line 147:		Line 147:

	--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 03:15, 25 September 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 03:15, 25 September 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Mrnorm said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Im in total agreement, you three are wise...thanks for that, lets just hope some day the world will change for the better and of corse sooner better than... later but not in my life time sorry to say...

			--[[User:Mrnorm\|Mrnorm]] 21:57, 11 October 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Markvd: Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

2011-09-25T02:15:36Z

Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:15, 25 September 2011
Line 140:		Line 140:

	--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 23:07, 24 September 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 23:07, 24 September 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Markvd said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			That would be the correct number but our population can barely with sense and reason calculate enough homes and jobs. How can they fathom 500,000 million. It is best to reach an attainable goal and as they see the quality of life increase dramatically for the better then maybe we through some reason we might I highly doubt would would reach that number through our own reasoning rather than possible wars or natural catastrophies and stresses on the planet. You must factor in the stubborn quality which currently prevails and will not allow man to utilize reason at the current time. Only through gradual and reasonable population decrease will it ever occur. I think our stresses on the planet however as they say will reach a peak in 2012 maybe that will be the time people will awaken to reason.

			--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 03:15, 25 September 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Barbarian216: Comment provided by Hawaiian - via ArticleComments extension

2011-09-24T22:07:22Z

Comment provided by Hawaiian - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 24 September 2011
Line 126:		Line 126:

	--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 19:42, 22 September 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 19:42, 22 September 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Hawaiian said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Based on a planet the size of Earth and its natural ability to sustain a human population without overstressing its available resources accordingly to its land mass area, the maximum size comes out to about 529 million human beings. This figure is derived from the natural regenerative cycle of balance between the impact of humans on the environment and the planet’s ability to heal itself and continue without undue stress.

			This figure takes into consideration that ALL dams are taken down, nuclear energy production ceased, massive cities reduced to rural areas, former productive areas returned to farmlands and other “green” projects to replace those that produce a large carbon footprint along with renewable environmental friendly energy.

			However, Earth can temporarily sustain a higher number than 529 million say around 1-2 billion, but drastic changes must take place that will require an adjusted formulation to the above statement. For example retaining some dams to increase the food production areas and densely populated areas subjected to self-sustaining environmental standards as not to strain other land mass areas. It can be worked out and at the moment is probably the most logical and reasonable approach.

			However many obstacles are facing this resolution because of political and economic reasons, larger countries may want to keep their population high, for it equates to more power and influence than one which is small.


			--[[User:Barbarian216\|Hawaiian]] 23:07, 24 September 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Markvd: Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

2011-09-22T18:42:14Z

Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 22 September 2011
Line 119:		Line 119:

	--[[User:Mrnorm\|Mrnorm]] 17:52, 22 September 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Mrnorm\|Mrnorm]] 17:52, 22 September 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Markvd said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Like Yoda from Star Wars would say, that is why you fail because you do not believe you can do it. This is a very easy and simplistic task. It takes certain human qualities to achieve it however, courage, determination, duty, math, science, etc. Unfortunately not many are educated enough to make it happen but if they work together they will.

			--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 19:42, 22 September 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Mrnorm: Comment provided by Mrnorm - via ArticleComments extension

2011-09-22T16:52:20Z

Comment provided by Mrnorm - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 22 September 2011
Line 112:		Line 112:

	--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 01:20, 22 September 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 01:20, 22 September 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Mrnorm said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			Look guys i agree with what you just said 101% but this cant even be done with out world leadership... and theres no known power on earth that can do what you say in the next 498.9 years with out ET intervention of some kind, people are going to just keep poping out babys,doing drugs,killing-well you know the rest...So lets take this brake of population control... its just not going to happen unless ET steps in... any thing elce is just a wish list sorry to say...I have read where other worlds have taken up our stile of religion and they have failed to the point that they have no world any more...life is predestined ... were just living in its space... unless theres an intervension of some kind... also theres more than one ET out there that just might be making intervension plans right now for the future of earth... good are bad... even tho billy went 500 years into earths future ... hes not aloud to tell what he knows are seen...

			--[[User:Mrnorm\|Mrnorm]] 17:52, 22 September 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>

Markvd: Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

2011-09-22T00:20:44Z

Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 22 September 2011
Line 105:		Line 105:

	--[[User:Zameen\|Zameen]] 22:55, 21 September 2011 (BST)		--[[User:Zameen\|Zameen]] 22:55, 21 September 2011 (BST)
			</div>
			== Markvd said ... ==

			<div class='commentBlock'>
			We don't have to lower the population to 500 million, I think it is impossible for Earth to tell you the truth. We just have to reach a level where every person has a home and some work. I mean if I were on the outside looking into Earth and let's say there are 8 billion people and 2 billion of those are homeless and starving. How can we be called human for that massive miscalculation of our fellow man. HMMMMMMMMMMMM I think a more reasonable number for our intelligence level is around 3-3.5 billion with only 2 kids max per family. If we could reach that I think our world would look like a responsible one.

			--[[User:Markvd\|Markvd]] 01:20, 22 September 2011 (BST)
	</div>		</div>