User talk:Zutt - Revision history

Daniel Leech: Blanked the page

2019-01-19T08:06:02Z

Blanked the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:06, 19 January 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hello Stefan. well done for your work on it, what your doing is great. Regarding the image of the newspaper you uploaded, you have done well, I have nothing bad to say about it, good on keeping the size down of the image, I find it better to have a resolution of between 600px width and 1000px width, mediawiki has a technology built in which resizes the thumbnail automatically. To get the size down I usually compress the jpg to 70% quality and for a newspaper articles it might be possible to get away with as low as 30% quality, if you don’t have photoshop or another photo editing then you can use an online one by searching jpg compress online through google or another search engine. At the moment I assume you cannot read the text on the image clearly enough to understand it. But it gives a good flavour of what is available in the book anyway, it is just better to have high resolution with mediawiki to give the choice, you can click the update button on the media properties page to update if you want to.

Daniel Leech at 06:44, 19 January 2019

2019-01-19T06:44:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:44, 19 January 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hello Stefan. well done for your work on it, what your doing is great. Regarding the image of the newspaper you uploaded, you have done well, I have nothing bad to say about it, good on keeping the size down of the image, I find it better to have a resolution of between 600px width and 1000px width, mediawiki has a technology built in which resizes the thumbnail automatically. To get the size down I usually compress the jpg to 70% quality and for a newspaper articles it might be possible to get away with as low as 30% quality, if you don’t have photoshop or another photo editing then you can use an online one by searching jpg compress online through google or another search engine. At the moment I assume you cannot read the text on the image clearly enough to understand it. But it gives a good flavour of what is available in the book anyway, it is just better to have high resolution with mediawiki, you can click the update button on the media properties page to update if you want to.		Hello Stefan. well done for your work on it, what your doing is great. Regarding the image of the newspaper you uploaded, you have done well, I have nothing bad to say about it, good on keeping the size down of the image, I find it better to have a resolution of between 600px width and 1000px width, mediawiki has a technology built in which resizes the thumbnail automatically. To get the size down I usually compress the jpg to 70% quality and for a newspaper articles it might be possible to get away with as low as 30% quality, if you don’t have photoshop or another photo editing then you can use an online one by searching jpg compress online through google or another search engine. At the moment I assume you cannot read the text on the image clearly enough to understand it. But it gives a good flavour of what is available in the book anyway, it is just better to have high resolution with mediawiki to give the choice, you can click the update button on the media properties page to update if you want to.

Daniel Leech at 06:44, 19 January 2019

2019-01-19T06:44:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:44, 19 January 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hello Stefan. well done for your work on it, what your doing is great. Regarding the image of the newspaper you uploaded, you have done well, I have nothing bad to say about it, good on keeping the size down of the image, I find it better to have a resolution of between 600px width and 1000px width, mediawiki has a technology built in which resizes the thumbnail automatically. To get the size down I usually compress the jpg to 70% quality and for a newspaper articles it might be possible to get away with as low as 30% quality, if you don’t have photoshop or another photo editing then you can use an online one by searching jpg compress online through google or another search engine. At the moment I assume you cannot read the ~~test~~ on the image clearly enough to understand it. But it gives a good flavour of what is available in the book anyway, it is just better to have high resolution with mediawiki, you can click the update button on the media properties page to update if you want to.		Hello Stefan. well done for your work on it, what your doing is great. Regarding the image of the newspaper you uploaded, you have done well, I have nothing bad to say about it, good on keeping the size down of the image, I find it better to have a resolution of between 600px width and 1000px width, mediawiki has a technology built in which resizes the thumbnail automatically. To get the size down I usually compress the jpg to 70% quality and for a newspaper articles it might be possible to get away with as low as 30% quality, if you don’t have photoshop or another photo editing then you can use an online one by searching jpg compress online through google or another search engine. At the moment I assume you cannot read the text on the image clearly enough to understand it. But it gives a good flavour of what is available in the book anyway, it is just better to have high resolution with mediawiki, you can click the update button on the media properties page to update if you want to.

Daniel Leech: Created page with "Hello Stefan. well done for your work on it, what your doing is great. Regarding the image of the newspaper you uploaded, you have done well, I have nothing bad to say about i..."

2019-01-19T06:42:08Z

Created page with "Hello Stefan. well done for your work on it, what your doing is great. Regarding the image of the newspaper you uploaded, you have done well, I have nothing bad to say about i..."

New page

Hello Stefan. well done for your work on it, what your doing is great. Regarding the image of the newspaper you uploaded, you have done well, I have nothing bad to say about it, good on keeping the size down of the image, I find it better to have a resolution of between 600px width and 1000px width, mediawiki has a technology built in which resizes the thumbnail automatically. To get the size down I usually compress the jpg to 70% quality and for a newspaper articles it might be possible to get away with as low as 30% quality, if you don’t have photoshop or another photo editing then you can use an online one by searching jpg compress online through google or another search engine. At the moment I assume you cannot read the test on the image clearly enough to understand it. But it gives a good flavour of what is available in the book anyway, it is just better to have high resolution with mediawiki, you can click the update button on the media properties page to update if you want to.