Talk:Contact Report 037: Difference between revisions

From Future Of Mankind
Comment provided by Thomas57 - via ArticleComments extension
Redtk21 (talk | contribs)
Comment provided by Redtk21 - via ArticleComments extension
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:


--[[User:Thomas57|Thomas Horner]] 00:14, 14 June 2010 (BST)
--[[User:Thomas57|Thomas Horner]] 00:14, 14 June 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Thomas57 said ... ==
<div class='commentBlock'>
There are several inconsistencies in the Contact reporting data - of which this is one.
In 2006 Ptaah tells Billy that the 'electromagnetic earth energies are the causal agent of the Hills 'abduction.
While I am not 'muddying over Ptaah's comments, perhaps - it behooves ALL of us reading ANY material to cross reference it and to think about the consequences to exposing more than necessary to others.
--[[User:Thomas57|Thomas Horner]] 00:15, 14 June 2010 (BST)
</div>
== Redtk21 said ... ==
<div class='commentBlock'>
Thomas57 Semjase made an error here, not a thorough research -- later corrected by Ptaah.
--[[User:Redtk21|Redtk21]] ([[User talk:Redtk21|talk]]),  09:48, 13 August 2013 (CEST)
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 07:48, 13 August 2013

Jamesm 00:29, 16 February 2008 (GMT) If anyone knows where I can get the German for this Contact Report please email me. Thanks.

Thomas57 said ...

There are several inconsistencies in the Contact reporting data - of which this is one. In 2006 Ptaah tells Billy that the 'electromagnetic earth energies are the causal agent of the Hills 'abduction.

While I am not 'muddying over Ptaah's comments, perhaps - it behooves ALL of us reading ANY material to cross reference it and to think about the consequences to exposing more than necessary to others.

--Thomas Horner 00:14, 14 June 2010 (BST)

Thomas57 said ...

There are several inconsistencies in the Contact reporting data - of which this is one. In 2006 Ptaah tells Billy that the 'electromagnetic earth energies are the causal agent of the Hills 'abduction.

While I am not 'muddying over Ptaah's comments, perhaps - it behooves ALL of us reading ANY material to cross reference it and to think about the consequences to exposing more than necessary to others.

--Thomas Horner 00:15, 14 June 2010 (BST)

Redtk21 said ...

Thomas57 Semjase made an error here, not a thorough research -- later corrected by Ptaah.

--Redtk21 (talk), 09:48, 13 August 2013 (CEST)