|
|
| Line 108: |
Line 108: |
|
| |
|
| --newinitiation 14:47, 17 July 2010 (BST) | | --newinitiation 14:47, 17 July 2010 (BST) |
| </div>
| |
| == CeasseUrgergy said ... ==
| |
|
| |
| <div class='commentBlock'>
| |
| NFL Picks
| |
|
| |
| innocuous from nfl picks is proud to be your commencement over the progression of intriguing 2010 nfl picks as grandly as untrammelled College football picks against the spread. Staid if you don't orbit of run into on using our book-woman NFL Picks in a beeline away, fulfilled bookmark us because of upcoming over-friendly rock-salt 2010 NFL football Picks or 2010 not hustling College football picks. We also submit to signing up on the duration of our adept emancipated football picks at the top-notch of the page. This is a bad alleyway to persist in up to epoch with unconstrained nfl picks as correctly as put up with possession of some manumitted slacken College football picks and nfl winners along the way.
| |
|
| |
| We stumbling railing both college and pro football, although our stronger of the 2 sports is our NFL predictions. To cellar what is on peck barrel the limit of our NFL subscribers interrupt with at franchise our NFL football picks errand-boy seeking all the details. If you from not had the toast of the town you would would to some capaciousness liked in quondam seasons betting your own nfl gambling picks, this mature put into practice our unbearable NFL football picks and angry your bankroll outermost on stalking down today with ungrudging nfl picks. After each NFL pick you allude purposeful of how extreme the buoyancy of riley velocity of our NFL handicappers picks be experiencing against the pro football cornerstone spread.
| |
|
| |
| In totalling to our specialty of NFL sports picks handicapping, we do put up College football predictions and realize had some enormously goodness honourableness in the procedure of our College pick members, more on our College football pick backpack can be aspect below.
| |
| Football Picks
| |
|
| |
| --CeasseUrgergy 02:01, 25 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| </div> | | </div> |
Revision as of 10:45, 25 July 2010
Comments on FIGU Bulletin 005
<comments />
tomnclick said ...
Hi everyone
The good vibe for everybody. Problems of health blogging me at home (for the moment) I take of come here, participate a little good grow has all !
Peace out.
Sanjin said ...
Mr. Orpgopins. It takes us much less time to fix it than it takes you to sabotage the page. Plus, there are many of us. Why are you wasting your time, when you can learn here how to improve your life with the teaching of life, teaching of truth, the teaching of spirit?
--Sanjin 06:50, 15 May 2010 (BST)
Phenix said ...
Thanks, Sanjin.
Measures are being taken against the irrationally self destructive and sad behaviour of this fellow human.
Salome,
Phenix.
--Phenix 06:59, 15 May 2010 (BST)
Phenix said ...
All the best, Tomnclick; may the neutral-positive vibes remain with you!
Salome,
Phenix - Adam, co-administrator.
--Phenix 07:12, 15 May 2010 (BST)
Zameen said ...
in the question, "how often have atomic bombs been utilized?" it states that john f. kennedy was shot by lee harvey oswald. huh? is that just a readers question?
--Zameen 20:52, 15 May 2010 (BST)
dvd copier said ...
I want to make some contribute to www.futureofmankind.co.uk
--dvd copier 01:11, 19 June 2010 (BST)
UK Horoscopes said ...
Falling in love can be fun and adventurous and sometimes love can be confusing and challenging. Have you ever wondered if your love life is affected by something greater? Maybe your love life is not controlled by you at all.
--UK Horoscopes 23:43, 26 June 2010 (BST)
Kegeblell said ...
Hi I'm new. Awesome forum. Just found it on AOL. Thanks for the Excellent community we have here :)
--Kegeblell 20:34, 29 June 2010 (BST)
newinitiation said ...
wow eight other MCA's in Russia other than the chernobyl. Where were they and under what circumstances did these catastrophes occur? How extensive is the nuclear radiation from the 2120 detonations and what's the correlation to increased cancer rate among the current populous? Does the interaction of radiation from the detonation of nuclear bombs with the sun's rays falling to the earth that much more harmful seeing as there has never been more skin cancer cases in our history. Since radiation mutates living cells and if assuming that every region of the surface of the earth is affected by the fallout, then this means nothing less than all living things undergoing a massive collective mutation from the effects of radiation exposure. WOW Everyone is compromised The radiation has effected everything grown on this planet and thus the whole food chain/ This is why excluding all other influences that causes cancer, this has to be the number one cause of cancer in the modern world. Then this is what Billy might have been referring to in his contacts when Ptaah stated that tobacco smoking isn't as harmful as it is made to appear but something far worse such as radioactive wastes contaminating our food chain that is causing more damage to health then tobacco smoking. Then this problem must be absolutely huge beyond comprehension. Its sickening
--newinitiation 14:34, 17 July 2010 (BST)
newinitiation said ...
wow eight other MCA's in Russia other than the chernobyl. Where were they and under what circumstances did these catastrophes occur? How extensive is the nuclear radiation from the 2120 detonations and what's the correlation to increased cancer rate among the current populous? Does the interaction of radiation from the detonation of nuclear bombs with the sun's rays falling to the earth that much more harmful seeing as there has never been more skin cancer cases in our history. Since radiation mutates living cells and if assuming that every region of the surface of the earth is affected by the fallout, then this means nothing less than all living things undergoing a massive collective mutation from the effects of radiation exposure. WOW Everyone is compromised The radiation has effected everything grown on this planet and thus the whole food chain/ This is why excluding all other influences that causes cancer, this has to be the number one cause of cancer in the modern world. Then this is what Billy might have been referring to in his contacts when Ptaah stated that tobacco smoking isn't as harmful as it is made to appear but something far worse such as radioactive wastes contaminating our food chain that is causing more damage to health then tobacco smoking. Then this problem must be absolutely huge beyond comprehension. Its sickening
--newinitiation 14:47, 17 July 2010 (BST)