Talk:Contact Report 128: Difference between revisions

From Future Of Mankind
STEELY (talk | contribs)
Comment provided by STEELY - via ArticleComments extension
Alive (talk | contribs)
Comment provided by I - via ArticleComments extension
Line 19: Line 19:


--[[User:STEELY|STEELY]] 00:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
--[[User:STEELY|STEELY]] 00:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
</div>
== I said ... ==
<div class='commentBlock'>
The case of Engelbert & Bernadette poses some ethical problems worth to be thought of.Their past personalities were friends. Although not as close as they are today, their past personalities respect each other as good as their current personalities do now. Why should they not become lovers? One is a male and the other is a female human life form. They are not homosexuals. Why should they not become lovers? They are not relatives. There will be no incest. Why should they not become lovers? Heck, they are not psychos either. Why should they not become lovers?
If two lovers may gradually become just friends, why two friends may not gradually become lovers?
If the transformation of love into friendship is considered normal, then what is abnormal on the transformation of friendship into love?
On 26 January 1980 (Contact Report 126) Semiase asked mister Billy to intervene on the affectionate intergenderal relationship between Engelbert and Bernadette, and then on 15 February 1980 (Contact Report 128) she asked him not to intervene on the coming bad event concerning Engelbert. How could it be ethically justified?
Postscript: It seems to me that it was Semiase who made the case got complicated. She made mister Billy hesitate to act, since she said that mister Billy's intervention would aggravate the coming event. I think mister Billy's intervention could be done in a way that it would only minimize the damage of the coming bad event, not prevent the event completely. That means the accident will still happen, but Engelbert and Maria will get only scratches, not injuries. The already determined event will still happen, but with a little modification.
--[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 05:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 05:13, 3 February 2012

Comments on Contact Report 128 <comments />


Markvd said ...

As a child due to movie and book manipulation feared 666 up to age 5, then after adding all up the most feared number should be zero or 0 because it always equals 0. :) Then again do not fear it could mean the beginning of something new and different. The most feared number would have to be 911 from my observations.

--Markvd 01:48, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

STEELY said ...

A POSSIBLE NOTE OF INTEREST IS THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN BILLY’S CALCULATIONS AND THE WORKS OF AN GENTLEMEN BY THE NAME OF MARKO RODIN, http://www.rense.com/RodinAerodynamics.htm “The 1,2,4,8,7,5 is the third dimension while the oscillation between the 3 and 6 demonstrates the fourth dimension, which is the higher dimensional magnetic field of an electrical coil. The 3, 9, and 6 always occur together with the 9 as the control.…” THANK YOU FOR POSTING A VERY THOUGHT-PROVOKING CONTACT.


--STEELY 00:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I said ...

The case of Engelbert & Bernadette poses some ethical problems worth to be thought of.Their past personalities were friends. Although not as close as they are today, their past personalities respect each other as good as their current personalities do now. Why should they not become lovers? One is a male and the other is a female human life form. They are not homosexuals. Why should they not become lovers? They are not relatives. There will be no incest. Why should they not become lovers? Heck, they are not psychos either. Why should they not become lovers?

If two lovers may gradually become just friends, why two friends may not gradually become lovers?

If the transformation of love into friendship is considered normal, then what is abnormal on the transformation of friendship into love?

On 26 January 1980 (Contact Report 126) Semiase asked mister Billy to intervene on the affectionate intergenderal relationship between Engelbert and Bernadette, and then on 15 February 1980 (Contact Report 128) she asked him not to intervene on the coming bad event concerning Engelbert. How could it be ethically justified?



Postscript: It seems to me that it was Semiase who made the case got complicated. She made mister Billy hesitate to act, since she said that mister Billy's intervention would aggravate the coming event. I think mister Billy's intervention could be done in a way that it would only minimize the damage of the coming bad event, not prevent the event completely. That means the accident will still happen, but Engelbert and Maria will get only scratches, not injuries. The already determined event will still happen, but with a little modification.

---- M -- 05:13, 3 February 2012 (UTC)