Talk:How To Create Peace And Harmony On Earth
Jamesm 21:30, 20 November 2009 (UTC) Any advice out there for this article would be welcome.
Jamesm 02:35, 21 November 2009 (UTC) Or comments too! Fire away at me. Be blunt. Be honest.
--Sanjin 07:33, 22 November 2009 (UTC)Hey bud. Good page. "Vision" would probably be a better way to express it than "imagination", although the good intentions sometimes do seem like imagination in this world.
Hi James, I hope you dont' mind but I added one line to the section under human rights: Free access to all available methods of transportation, including one private transport vehicle per household Good Work-Scott
Jamesm 21:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC) Thanks guys, I appreciate it.
MarksmanR 12:16, 23 November 2009 (UTC) This article is a great idea James, I love it. It is also my dream.
Ok the bottom part sounds alright- BUT the top part is too drastic for my taste, it sounds like Socialism, Communism and wreaks of NEW WORLD ORDER~ Thats my thoughts- Revision on what would be more realistic??? or what is predicted to be true directly from Mr. Meier would be a better approach... Thanks!
Jamesm 22:37, 23 November 2009 (UTC) Thanks MarksmanR. Jbehr, please make any changes you see fit and then justify it here? Also when you edit this discussion page please type four consecutive tildes (~~~~) before your next comment in order to insert a signature followed by the time in UTC just like you see in most paragraphs of this discussion page. Thanks!
Hawaiian 19:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Sounds like a tall order, although this framework of proposals appears in conjunction to what the Plejarens recommend for Earth, it still lacks the authoritarian apparatus to counter both internal and external negative forces that WILL intervene in order to fulfill and/or maintain the current “status quo” of power lust. Has anyone really thought about the Creator Overlords or their counter-parts including the Ashtar followers and others who vowed revenge? Also as in the past, scientists with uncontrollable ego centric tendencies and we exclusively required to counter these occurrences should it happen?
Some would say, “That’s the reason for the international troops”, but logic will prevail since scientists will develop weapons that will make these forces obsolete.
Will the Plejarens or any one of their allies be willing to stand by these proposals to ensure it bears fruit or conveniently sit by because of some sick “free will” clause as was done in the past? Anyone in their rightful mind is aware that the secret agencies and their cohorts will put a bullet in your head the minute they believe their power base is being threatened.
The question remains, who is willing to take that risk and how many have to die in order to make these proposals bear fruit or will it ever take root at all considering that those currently in power will “allow” such endeavors to occur at their predicament?
Until these concerns are met and though I support such measures, considering the fact that sinister forces do have much control over its destiny, at this conjuncture the most logical reasoning is to adhere to one’s current quest to promote internal spiritual evolution without drawing unnecessary negative forces against your well being. The vast majority of Earth humans is too weak to counter these forces and would be in vain to do so at the present time the way circumstances are at this moment. (Just look how many times both Earthly and malevolent ET’s have tried to kill Billy at least 21 times in some cases direct intervention by the Plejarens prevented as least one attempt)
In its present form and the present situation here on Earth, this proposal should be presented to the UN, but don’t hold your hopes up too high, it’s still a political slew of composite nations with their own selfish agendas to promote.
However, I would like to add one input that every husband and male human be given a place of refugee an apartment exclusively for him and off limits to women like on the planet Erra.
Alive said ...
Alive said ...
3. Prerequisites for marriage: [....] No sexual contact for first 6 months of relationship. Lust is a primitive emotion and is confused with true love. Sexual interaction can produce false dependencies on partner (unenforceable but should at least be a recommendation during education).
I am afraid that after the first 6 months of their relationships young people will become masturbators for the rest of their lives.
---- M -- 20:39, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Jamesm said ...
So is 3 months more acceptable you think? :D
--Jamesm 21:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Markvd said ...
It seems the resources are the call to war nowadays. It seems every big money company is securing all they can even in territories not in there regions. It's time to wake up to reality and apply it, governments of Earth.:)
--Markvd 01:17, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Alive said ...
James M,
I think two weeks is long enough for young people to contemplate their ongoing relationships and make decision whether they would treat their partners as lovers or as pleasure objects. Three months would make them unsure about their own thoughts and feelings, and make them hesitate to make decision. I am afraid it would produce mass celibacy in a scale we have never seen in entire Terra's history.
---- M -- 12:38, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Alive said ...
On the section "Destroy Almost All Nuclear Weapons", second point: "Exception: the CWA should keep a cache of nuclear weapons in case of a meteor-threat."
My suggestions:
1. In order to minimize the danger of nuclear accident, the storage of CWA's nuclear weapons should be placed on Mars using ancient warfare facilities left by the Martians.
2. No alcohol beverage should be allowed to enter Mars (if we take CWA soldiers's characters into consideration).
---- M -- 13:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Ritak said ...
Thanks for compiling this information. It makes for an excellent high quality read and gives me hope. I like it when someone has a clear plan! :-) Salome.
--Ritak 21:23, 28 July 2011 (BST)
Markvd said ...
I have an absolutely ruthless plan, only correct thinking people can have children due to chosen few responsible people on Earth 7% or less. Due to lack of that one capability Earth reaches a more reasonable level some time in the year 2057. Each country shall be represented evenly, not one holding the true ring to rule them all. :) j/k In reality I suggest a mandatory worldwide summit of leaders so they can drastically change the numbers so all of humanity can evolve correctly and the the interesting developments not our current trend of rinse and repeat shall push us further. We won't get any further unless man learns that the few, the proud is not the way to go. They will have to learn to encompass all of man and give them the chance to find the true path and not block it with silly obstacles they currently have employed. You will have to mathematically prove through charts or a presentation that it is a feasable option due to less dramatic hollywood real life nature events, food quality, planetary deterioration, etc. Good luck and may the force be with the few that can make it happen.
--Markvd 22:11, 28 July 2011 (BST)
Alive said ...
Point 5 under the heading "Population decimation strategy ":
"Must have been "dating" for at least 2 years. (Monitoring by dating registry required)."
My questions are:
1. How about "backstreet dating"? Will it be monitored by dating registry or there will be another way to handle this special irregularity?
2. How about blind date? Does it blind the people who involved themselves with this risky game? How United Nations Spiritual Council should react to this epistemological problem?
---- M -- 06:47, 30 July 2011 (BST)
Markvd said ...
Houses on water sounds cool. It's like a boat house combo submarine defense. If we covered the entire ocean with these we would look like a giant egg farm from afar housing alien like creatures. :) I'm guessing no sudden movements in the dome house to prevent an earthquake simulation. Everybody practically has to be on one side of the room without unbalancing depending on size, so this sounds like a challenge for our unbalanced kind.
--Markvd 06:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Peace562 said ...
I would like to know who wrote this i have gone through half of this document , and this sounds almost entirely like the system know as the New World Order . One World Government , One World Bank , forced Sterilization , a "peace" army . I follow and study the spirit teaching but this sounds like this will enslave humanity not set it free.Surely There must be other ways to fix the problem of overpopulation. This To me sounds like a work of a rothschild family member or a rockefeller or zbiginew brezinski.
--Peace562 06:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Jamesm said ...
Hi there I am the author and I'd be interested for you to explain how you came to your conclusion that it would be worse for humanity rather than better.
Here's looking forward to a decent debate.
Peace,
James
--Jamesm 12:52, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
I said ...
I said ...
I think it is better if the dating registry is supervised by, heck, United Nations Spiritual Council, since the registry plays an extremely important role in deciding whether a man may marry the woman (or the women) he loves or not. I am afraid if the registry is allowed to operate without any supervision, it would gradually evolve into a state within state and arbitrarily ban any kind of civil partnership. Peace and harmony could not be found anywhere on Earth, since the ban would trigger massive uprisings in every country. Even people who have decided not to have a civil partnership with anyone will join the uprisings. I do not know why.
---- M -- 14:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Jamesm said ...
Hi M! Yes the UNSpC or perhaps a department of that, the UN Department for Family Planning maybe? We could be here for a long time creating a whole new hierarchy of departments if we really wanted to be thorough in completing this, erm, visionary document. I shall consider how I might expand this document but on the face of it I am not qualified to get it right since I havent even read spirit lesson number 1 yet....
--Jamesm 22:23, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
I guess it would be better if Central World Army entirely consists of Highlander swordmen equipped with samurai swords and old fine Scottish Whiskey.
---- M -- 17:16, 6 March 2011 (UTC)