Talk:Dekalog Dodekalog: Difference between revisions
From Future Of Mankind
Comment provided by Natdrip - via ArticleComments extension |
Comment provided by Markvd - via ArticleComments extension |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--[[User:Natdrip|Natdrip]] 17:29, 16 August 2011 (BST) | --[[User:Natdrip|Natdrip]] 17:29, 16 August 2011 (BST) | ||
</div> | |||
== Markvd said ... == | |||
<div class='commentBlock'> | |||
If you are dealing with people not in there right minds or correctness of judgement one must be clever to elude there current foolishness or should I say past foolishness Natdrip. Truth has the right time and place thus it being "timeless" when people are responsible enough to witness it's true power. :) | |||
--[[User:Markvd|Markvd]] 20:49, 17 August 2011 (BST) | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:49, 17 August 2011
Comments on Dekalog Dodekalog <comments />
Natdrip said ...
Markvd said ...
If you are dealing with people not in there right minds or correctness of judgement one must be clever to elude there current foolishness or should I say past foolishness Natdrip. Truth has the right time and place thus it being "timeless" when people are responsible enough to witness it's true power. :)
--Markvd 20:49, 17 August 2011 (BST)
I agree in the utmost with the excerpts above and would like to share a further understanding.
If I am approached with a situation as such: Let’s say you were in Germany in the 1940s hiding a Jewish family in your house. When the Gestapo comes calling, do you tell them the truth?
The answer should be, "No". Unless the situation was as such, that you could provide greater protection to the Truth by answering "Yes". If the purpose of life is consciousnesses related evolution then all thought process should stem from a respect of this.
--Natdrip 17:29, 16 August 2011 (BST)